Machine Learning-Assisted Optimisation of the Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB) Process Parameters of H13 Tool Steel Fabricated on a Preheated to 350 ∘C Building Platform

This study presents the first application of Machine Learning (ML) models to optimise Powder Bed Fusion using Laser Beam (PBF-LB) process parameters for H13 steel fabricated on a 350 °C preheated building platform. A total of 189 cylindrical specimens were produced for training and testing machine learning (ML) models using variable process parameters: laser power (250-350 W), scanning speed (1050-1300 mm/s), and hatch spacing (65-90 μm). Eight ML models were investigated: 1. Support Vector Regression (SVR), 2. Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), 3. Stochastic Gradient Descent Regressor, 4. Random Forest Regressor (RFR), 5. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), 6. Extreme Gradient Boosting with limited depth (XGBoost LD), 7. Extra Trees Regressor (ETR) and 8. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). All models were trained using the Fast Library for Automated Machine Learning & Tuning (FLAML) framework to predict the relative density of the fabricated samples. Among these, the XGBoost model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with a coefficient of determination R2=0.977, mean absolute percentage error MAPE = 0.002, and mean absolute error MAE = 0.017. Experimental validation was conducted on 27 newly fabricated samples using ML predicted process parameters. Relative densities exceeding 99.6% of the theoretical value (7.76 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) for all models except XGBoost LD and KRR. The lowest MAE = 0.004 and the smallest difference between the ML-predicted and PBF-LB validated density were obtained for samples made with LightGBM-predicted parameters. Those samples exhibited a hardness of 604 ± 13 HV0.5, which increased to approximately 630 HV0.5 after tempering at 550 °C. The LightGBM optimised parameters were further applied to fabricate a part of a forging die incorporating internal through-cooling channels, demonstrating the efficacy of machine learning-guided optimisation in achieving dense, defect-free H13 components suitable for industrial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19010210
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Assisted Optimisation of the Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB) Process Parameters of H13 Tool Steel Fabricated on a Preheated to 350 ∘C Building Platform

Daniel Dobras, Paweł Widomski, Katsiaryna Kosarava, Michał Ziętala et al.
Materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Machine Learning-Assisted Optimisation of the Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB) Process Parameters of H13 Tool Steel Fabricated on a Preheated to 350 ∘C Building Platform

Daniel Dobras, Paweł Widomski, Katsiaryna Kosarava, Michał Ziętala, Marek Muzyk, Bartłomiej Adam Wysocki
article en

Abstract

This study presents the first application of Machine Learning (ML) models to optimise Powder Bed Fusion using Laser Beam (PBF-LB) process parameters for H13 steel fabricated on a 350 °C preheated building platform. A total of 189 cylindrical specimens were produced for training and testing machine learning (ML) models using variable process parameters: laser power (250-350 W), scanning speed (1050-1300 mm/s), and hatch spacing (65-90 μm). Eight ML models were investigated: 1. Support Vector Regression (SVR), 2. Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), 3. Stochastic Gradient Descent Regressor, 4. Random Forest Regressor (RFR), 5. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), 6. Extreme Gradient Boosting with limited depth (XGBoost LD), 7. Extra Trees Regressor (ETR) and 8. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). All models were trained using the Fast Library for Automated Machine Learning & Tuning (FLAML) framework to predict the relative density of the fabricated samples. Among these, the XGBoost model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with a coefficient of determination R2=0.977, mean absolute percentage error MAPE = 0.002, and mean absolute error MAE = 0.017. Experimental validation was conducted on 27 newly fabricated samples using ML predicted process parameters. Relative densities exceeding 99.6% of the theoretical value (7.76 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) for all models except XGBoost LD and KRR. The lowest MAE = 0.004 and the smallest difference between the ML-predicted and PBF-LB validated density were obtained for samples made with LightGBM-predicted parameters. Those samples exhibited a hardness of 604 ± 13 HV0.5, which increased to approximately 630 HV0.5 after tempering at 550 °C. The LightGBM optimised parameters were further applied to fabricate a part of a forging die incorporating internal through-cooling channels, demonstrating the efficacy of machine learning-guided optimisation in achieving dense, defect-free H13 components suitable for industrial applications.

MaterialsVol. 19(1)
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Łukasiewicz Research Network (PL), Łukasiewicz Research Network - Metal Forming Institute (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL), Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.