Rethinking Glycemic Control: The Intensive Care Unit Pro-con Debate on Continuous versus Conventional Glucose Monitoring

Pro-ConContinuous glucose monitoring sensors can be of two broad types: subcutaneous glucose monitoring devices and intravascular glucose monitoring devices.Subcutaneous devices that measure the glucose concentration in the interstitial fluid are commonly used and are usually factory-calibrated.Intravascular glucose monitoring devices, which measure the glucose concentration in the blood, are not commonly used because of the risk of thrombosis, bleeding, and the invasiveness of the device. 7y offering almost real-time glucose trends, alarms for impending hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia, and the potential to reduce nursing workload, CGM technology has gained significant attention as a tool that might transform glycemic management in the ICU.At the same time, concerns persist regarding the device accuracy in critically ill patients, sensor performance during hemodynamic instability, integration challenges with existing nursing workflows, and the clinical relevance of detecting every minute fluctuation of glucose levels. 8Around 4-15% of hypoglycemic events are undetected in critically ill patients, and this percentage increases with decreased frequency of checking glucose levels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Acute Care
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10089-0205
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Glycemic Control: The Intensive Care Unit Pro-con Debate on Continuous versus Conventional Glucose Monitoring

Shabnam Shashidhar
Journal of Acute Care
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

Rethinking Glycemic Control: The Intensive Care Unit Pro-con Debate on Continuous versus Conventional Glucose Monitoring

Shabnam Shashidhar
article en

Abstract

Pro-ConContinuous glucose monitoring sensors can be of two broad types: subcutaneous glucose monitoring devices and intravascular glucose monitoring devices.Subcutaneous devices that measure the glucose concentration in the interstitial fluid are commonly used and are usually factory-calibrated.Intravascular glucose monitoring devices, which measure the glucose concentration in the blood, are not commonly used because of the risk of thrombosis, bleeding, and the invasiveness of the device. 7y offering almost real-time glucose trends, alarms for impending hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia, and the potential to reduce nursing workload, CGM technology has gained significant attention as a tool that might transform glycemic management in the ICU.At the same time, concerns persist regarding the device accuracy in critically ill patients, sensor performance during hemodynamic instability, integration challenges with existing nursing workflows, and the clinical relevance of detecting every minute fluctuation of glucose levels. 8Around 4-15% of hypoglycemic events are undetected in critically ill patients, and this percentage increases with decreased frequency of checking glucose levels.

Journal of Acute CareVol. 4(3)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.