Labeling gender across and beyond the binary

Abstract This article focuses on the formal codification of the gender-neutral pronoun hen in Norwegian by analysing retrospective narratives from two central staff from the Language Council of Norway as well as two lexicographers in charge of the entry in the Norwegian Standard dictionaries ( Nynorskordboka and Bokmålsordboka ). The analyses employ labeling theory as a theoretical lens and it is situated in the field of language policy and planning (LPP). The participants depict a stepwise process: (1) enquiries and preparations , (2) a period of turmoil with the allocation of power to different actors and (3) publication, reception and acceptance . Beyond this process, a historical shift is described in the power relation in LPP between majority and minority in the language community, which includes an increased respect for a minority’s right to self-labeling, and perhaps also increased attention paid to avoiding linguistic wounding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.24033.bug
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labeling gender across and beyond the binary

Edit Bugge, Hege Myklebust, Trude Bukve
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Gender Studies in Language
article

Labeling gender across and beyond the binary

Edit Bugge, Hege Myklebust, Trude Bukve
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article focuses on the formal codification of the gender-neutral pronoun hen in Norwegian by analysing retrospective narratives from two central staff from the Language Council of Norway as well as two lexicographers in charge of the entry in the Norwegian Standard dictionaries ( Nynorskordboka and Bokmålsordboka ). The analyses employ labeling theory as a theoretical lens and it is situated in the field of language policy and planning (LPP). The participants depict a stepwise process: (1) enquiries and preparations , (2) a period of turmoil with the allocation of power to different actors and (3) publication, reception and acceptance . Beyond this process, a historical shift is described in the power relation in LPP between majority and minority in the language community, which includes an increased respect for a minority’s right to self-labeling, and perhaps also increased attention paid to avoiding linguistic wounding.

Journal of Language and SexualityVol. 15(1)
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.