Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Xenogeneic Bone, Hyaluronic Acid, and Dermal Matrix by Tunnel Technique: A Case Series

<b>Background</b>: Several minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to augment horizontal ridge volume for prosthetically driven implant placement, utilizing different biomaterials to enhance regenerative outcomes. This article presents two clinical cases illustrating a tunneling approach for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using a combination of xenogeneic bone graft, hyaluronic acid, and an acellular dermal matrix. <b>Methods</b>: A single vertical incision was made mesial to the bone defect and a dermal matrix was suitably shaped and positioned into the subperiosteal tunnel. Subsequently, the bone graft was inserted between the dermal matrix and the buccal bone plate. Primary wound closure was achieved. After six months, implants were placed. For each patient, an optical scan was performed at baseline (T<sub>0</sub>), at six months post-operative ridge augmentation surgery (T<sub>1</sub>) and at two months post-implant insertion (T<sub>2</sub>). A digital measurement of the horizontal ridge thickness was performed at each inserted implant site. Clinical parameters and patient postoperative morbidity were recorded. <b>Results</b>: The procedure was well tolerated by the patients. No postoperative clinical complications were observed. The mean tissue thickness achieved at T1 was recorded to be 13.3 mm. The same value was recorded at T2. <b>Conclusions</b>: This technique allowed the placement of prosthetically guided implants, with minimal morbidity and no observed complications. Further studies analyzing the histology of newly formed bone and performing three-dimensional radiological examinations to confirm the effectiveness of the surgical technique are warranted to validate these preliminary findings. Clinical Trial Number (NIH): NCT06424223.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14010025
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Xenogeneic Bone, Hyaluronic Acid, and Dermal Matrix by Tunnel Technique: A Case Series

Giuseppe D’Albis, Kezia Rachellea Müstakim, Marta Adriana Forte, Massimo Corsalini et al.
Dentistry Journal
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Xenogeneic Bone, Hyaluronic Acid, and Dermal Matrix by Tunnel Technique: A Case Series

Giuseppe D’Albis, Kezia Rachellea Müstakim, Marta Adriana Forte, Massimo Corsalini, Lorenzo Marini, Saverio Capodiferro, Andrea Pilloni
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Several minimally invasive techniques have been introduced to augment horizontal ridge volume for prosthetically driven implant placement, utilizing different biomaterials to enhance regenerative outcomes. This article presents two clinical cases illustrating a tunneling approach for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using a combination of xenogeneic bone graft, hyaluronic acid, and an acellular dermal matrix. <b>Methods</b>: A single vertical incision was made mesial to the bone defect and a dermal matrix was suitably shaped and positioned into the subperiosteal tunnel. Subsequently, the bone graft was inserted between the dermal matrix and the buccal bone plate. Primary wound closure was achieved. After six months, implants were placed. For each patient, an optical scan was performed at baseline (T<sub>0</sub>), at six months post-operative ridge augmentation surgery (T<sub>1</sub>) and at two months post-implant insertion (T<sub>2</sub>). A digital measurement of the horizontal ridge thickness was performed at each inserted implant site. Clinical parameters and patient postoperative morbidity were recorded. <b>Results</b>: The procedure was well tolerated by the patients. No postoperative clinical complications were observed. The mean tissue thickness achieved at T1 was recorded to be 13.3 mm. The same value was recorded at T2. <b>Conclusions</b>: This technique allowed the placement of prosthetically guided implants, with minimal morbidity and no observed complications. Further studies analyzing the histology of newly formed bone and performing three-dimensional radiological examinations to confirm the effectiveness of the surgical technique are warranted to validate these preliminary findings. Clinical Trial Number (NIH): NCT06424223.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(1)
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Hasanuddin University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.