Yet I Alive! Decision-Making during Pandemics in Daniel Defoe’s <i>A Journal of the Plague Year</i> ()

ABSTRACT This paper examines Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year through the lens of Herbert Simon’s decision-making theory, which outlines three sequential phases: intelligence, design, and choice. By applying this framework, we elucidate the cognitive challenges faced by the protagonist, H. F., as he confronts critical choices during the London plague. We argue that Defoe, though implicitly, structures H. F.’s decision-making process in accordance with Simon’s theory. Initially, H. F. engages in the “intelligence” phase by collecting data to understand the plague’s impact. Subsequently, he enters the “design” phase, evaluating potential actions based on this information. Finally, he executes the “choice” phase, committing to a course of action. This analysis reveals how individuals navigate uncertainty and limited information during crises. By demonstrating the relevance of Simon’s theory to Defoe’s narrative, this study provides a new interpretation of crisis-driven decision-making within the novel, enhancing our understanding of cognitive processes in literary contexts.”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.27.4.0512
Primary Topic
Narrative Theory and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Yet I Alive! Decision-Making during Pandemics in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year ()

Ebtihal Elshaikh, Mohammad Shaaban Deyab, Asmaa Abdelsalam Elshikh
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Narrative Theory and Analysis
article

Yet I Alive! Decision-Making during Pandemics in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year ()

Ebtihal Elshaikh, Mohammad Shaaban Deyab, Asmaa Abdelsalam Elshikh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year through the lens of Herbert Simon’s decision-making theory, which outlines three sequential phases: intelligence, design, and choice. By applying this framework, we elucidate the cognitive challenges faced by the protagonist, H. F., as he confronts critical choices during the London plague. We argue that Defoe, though implicitly, structures H. F.’s decision-making process in accordance with Simon’s theory. Initially, H. F. engages in the “intelligence” phase by collecting data to understand the plague’s impact. Subsequently, he enters the “design” phase, evaluating potential actions based on this information. Finally, he executes the “choice” phase, committing to a course of action. This analysis reveals how individuals navigate uncertainty and limited information during crises. By demonstrating the relevance of Simon’s theory to Defoe’s narrative, this study provides a new interpretation of crisis-driven decision-making within the novel, enhancing our understanding of cognitive processes in literary contexts.”

Interdisciplinary Literary StudiesVol. 27(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Narrative Theory and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Yet I Alive! Decision-Making during Pandemics in Daniel Defoe’s <i>A Journal of the Plague Year</i> () — Ebtihal Elshaikh, Mohammad Shaaban Deyab, et al. · Interdisciplinary Literary Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS