Efficient recovery and DNA extraction for algae-associated microbial communities

The extraction of high-quality microbial DNA from environmental samples is critical for many downstream applications, including short- and long-read metagenomic sequencing. However, environmental DNA is prone to low recovery, degradation, and contamination by enzymatic inhibitors, with the extent of these issues largely dependent on the DNA purification method. The embedding of bacterial cells in a mucoid matrix within biofilms further complicates the process, making the study of algal symbionts particularly challenging. This study benchmarked five methods to recover microbial cells from biofilms associated with three major groups of marine macroalgae, namely: red (<i>Palmaria stenogona</i>), brown (<i>Saccharina japonica</i>), and green (<i>Ulva lactuca</i>). This was followed by a systematic evaluation of six widely used commercial DNA purification kits for their ability to extract high-quality DNA suitable for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun sequencing. A universal trade-off was observed between the quantity and quality of the extracted DNA. While whole-sample homogenization and manual collection of biofilms resulted in high levels of chloroplast contamination, washing microbial cells with a buffer led to low DNA recovery; however, the use of a detergent improved DNA yields. A comparison of the DNA extraction kits revealed that their efficiency varied significantly among algal species, with the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific) identified as the most versatile. The present findings provide a comparative benchmark of methods to recover algae-associated microbial communities and extract their DNA, offering guidance in selecting procedures suited for metagenomic sequencing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1693747
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient recovery and DNA extraction for algae-associated microbial communities

Darya Slonova, Dmitry Sutormin, Andrey Sobolev, Alina Galivondzhyan et al.
Frontiers in Plant Science
Marine and coastal plant biology
article

Efficient recovery and DNA extraction for algae-associated microbial communities

Darya Slonova, Dmitry Sutormin, Andrey Sobolev, Alina Galivondzhyan, Alina Demkina, Artem Isaev, Olga Konovalova, Elizaveta Chevokina, Daria Sibiryakina, Daria Yurikova
article en

Abstract

The extraction of high-quality microbial DNA from environmental samples is critical for many downstream applications, including short- and long-read metagenomic sequencing. However, environmental DNA is prone to low recovery, degradation, and contamination by enzymatic inhibitors, with the extent of these issues largely dependent on the DNA purification method. The embedding of bacterial cells in a mucoid matrix within biofilms further complicates the process, making the study of algal symbionts particularly challenging. This study benchmarked five methods to recover microbial cells from biofilms associated with three major groups of marine macroalgae, namely: red (<i>Palmaria stenogona</i>), brown (<i>Saccharina japonica</i>), and green (<i>Ulva lactuca</i>). This was followed by a systematic evaluation of six widely used commercial DNA purification kits for their ability to extract high-quality DNA suitable for 16S rRNA gene and shotgun sequencing. A universal trade-off was observed between the quantity and quality of the extracted DNA. While whole-sample homogenization and manual collection of biofilms resulted in high levels of chloroplast contamination, washing microbial cells with a buffer led to low DNA recovery; however, the use of a detergent improved DNA yields. A comparison of the DNA extraction kits revealed that their efficiency varied significantly among algal species, with the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific) identified as the most versatile. The present findings provide a comparative benchmark of methods to recover algae-associated microbial communities and extract their DNA, offering guidance in selecting procedures suited for metagenomic sequencing.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Institute of Oceanology. PP Shirshov Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Gamalei Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology (RU), Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry (RU), Moscow State University (TJ), Medical Technologies (Czechia) (CZ)
Russian Science Foundation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Marine and coastal plant biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.