Insights from meta‐analysis for efficient docosahexaenoic acid production in thraustochytrids through advanced cultivation and fermentation strategies

Abstract This systematic review examines strategies for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) production by thraustochytrids, focusing on cultivation techniques, fermentation technologies, and carbon/nitrogen optimization to increase productivity. Among 169 eligible articles, the 100 most productive studies (0.7–10.3 g DHA L −1 per day) were analyzed. Quantitative variables like carbon/nitrogen concentrations, temperature, and aeration showed weak correlation with DHA productivity, while qualitative factors were more strongly associated. Artificially selected strains (4.25 ± 0.41 g DHA L −1 per day) were statistically superior to wild strains (2.71 ± 0.28 g DHA L −1 per day; P < 0.05) and were comparable with genetically modified strains (4.47 ± 0.87 g DHA L −1 per day; P = 0.81). Glucose (3.85 ± 0.3 g DHA L −1 per day) and glycerol (3.94 ± 1.1 g DHA L −1 per day) yielded the highest productivities among the carbon sources, with no significant difference between them ( P > 0.1). Continuous cultivation systems (7.25 ± 1.07 g DHA L −1 per day) and fed‐batch methods (4.44 ± 0.34 g DHA L −1 per day) yielded higher productivity than batch fermentation ( P < 0.005). The meta‐analysis indicates that combining advanced strains and fermentation systems increase DHA productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.70100
Primary Topic
Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights from meta‐analysis for efficient docosahexaenoic acid production in thraustochytrids through advanced cultivation and fermentation strategies

André da Luz de Freitas, Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe, Hervé Rogez, Gilberto Vinícius de Melo Pereira et al.
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
article

Insights from meta‐analysis for efficient docosahexaenoic acid production in thraustochytrids through advanced cultivation and fermentation strategies

André da Luz de Freitas, Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe, Hervé Rogez, Gilberto Vinícius de Melo Pereira, Carlos Ricardo Soccol, Lucas Araújo Guimarães, Jhiovana Cristielly Carrera Silva da Costa
article en

Abstract

Abstract This systematic review examines strategies for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) production by thraustochytrids, focusing on cultivation techniques, fermentation technologies, and carbon/nitrogen optimization to increase productivity. Among 169 eligible articles, the 100 most productive studies (0.7–10.3 g DHA L −1 per day) were analyzed. Quantitative variables like carbon/nitrogen concentrations, temperature, and aeration showed weak correlation with DHA productivity, while qualitative factors were more strongly associated. Artificially selected strains (4.25 ± 0.41 g DHA L −1 per day) were statistically superior to wild strains (2.71 ± 0.28 g DHA L −1 per day; P < 0.05) and were comparable with genetically modified strains (4.47 ± 0.87 g DHA L −1 per day; P = 0.81). Glucose (3.85 ± 0.3 g DHA L −1 per day) and glycerol (3.94 ± 1.1 g DHA L −1 per day) yielded the highest productivities among the carbon sources, with no significant difference between them ( P > 0.1). Continuous cultivation systems (7.25 ± 1.07 g DHA L −1 per day) and fed‐batch methods (4.44 ± 0.34 g DHA L −1 per day) yielded higher productivity than batch fermentation ( P < 0.005). The meta‐analysis indicates that combining advanced strains and fermentation systems increase DHA productivity.

Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningVol. 20(2)
Amazon Research Foundation (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Pará (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.