Challenges and recommendations for research security: Learning from research ethics and integrity

Collaborative and open research combined with influential technological advancements and geopolitical tensions allow Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and Research Performing Organisations (RPOs) to become prone to Research Security (RS) risks. Despite its recent conceptualisation, RS has been swiftly recognised as a critical issue globally, highlighting the need to quickly adopt policy actions. To this direction, the CHANGER consortium recommends policy actions particularly relevant to the European context. Policy actions are informed by the accumulated experience generated through established research ethics and integrity frameworks, in order to build resilience to RS risks, while ensuring freedom and openness of research. Adaptions to existing training programmes on research ethics and integrity programmes in order to embed RS considerations in the research culture, as well as the cultivation of professional expertise and capacity building in RS, are among these policy recommendations. Leveraging experience and insights from research ethics and integrity infrastructure offers valuable opportunities to raise awareness and establish procedures for safeguarding RS. The proposed policy actions offer flexibility to meet specific research needs of each HEI and RPO, and are proportionate to related risks rising from each research project. They foster capacity-building for researchers and cultivate a culture of awareness, shared responsibility and proactive responsiveness, facilitating the responsible internationalisation of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Ethics
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161251404962
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and recommendations for research security: Learning from research ethics and integrity

Vangelis Karkaletsis, Xenia Ziouvelou, Konstantina Giouvanopoulou, Vasiliki Mollaki
1 citations
Research Ethics
Academic integrity and plagiarism
25.65
article

Challenges and recommendations for research security: Learning from research ethics and integrity

Vangelis Karkaletsis, Xenia Ziouvelou, Konstantina Giouvanopoulou, Vasiliki Mollaki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Collaborative and open research combined with influential technological advancements and geopolitical tensions allow Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and Research Performing Organisations (RPOs) to become prone to Research Security (RS) risks. Despite its recent conceptualisation, RS has been swiftly recognised as a critical issue globally, highlighting the need to quickly adopt policy actions. To this direction, the CHANGER consortium recommends policy actions particularly relevant to the European context. Policy actions are informed by the accumulated experience generated through established research ethics and integrity frameworks, in order to build resilience to RS risks, while ensuring freedom and openness of research. Adaptions to existing training programmes on research ethics and integrity programmes in order to embed RS considerations in the research culture, as well as the cultivation of professional expertise and capacity building in RS, are among these policy recommendations. Leveraging experience and insights from research ethics and integrity infrastructure offers valuable opportunities to raise awareness and establish procedures for safeguarding RS. The proposed policy actions offer flexibility to meet specific research needs of each HEI and RPO, and are proportionate to related risks rising from each research project. They foster capacity-building for researchers and cultivate a culture of awareness, shared responsibility and proactive responsiveness, facilitating the responsible internationalisation of research.

Research Ethics
National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" (GR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
25.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenges and recommendations for research security: Learning from research ethics and integrity — Vangelis Karkaletsis, Xenia Ziouvelou, et al. · Research Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS