Reflections from a reflecting team: Systemic working in a community learning disability service

Although there is a growing evidence base for systemic working with people with a learning disability, this primarily has been presented through case studies. This article will focus on the reflections gathered from a reflecting team to consider how systemic provision in a community learning disability service could be improved. Key findings from a 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis proposed that two-three reflectors in a reflecting team, alongside pre and post debrief sessions with easy-read leaflets to support these was helpful. Considerations were also given to whether the reflecting team online or in person encourages a full systemic experience, and how best to conduct systemic supervision is also discussed. The findings from this evaluation may be transferable to systemic provision more broadly. Easy to read summary ■ People with a learning disability often have a system around them. This system can include lots of different people such as their family, friends, partners, professionals or staff team. ■ Working with the system can help everyone to understand each other and work together to make things better. ■ Staff from a psychology team have shared their thoughts about how to make their work with systems better. ■ Providing support before, during and after this work with systems can be helpful for all involved. Also holding sessions face-to-face can be more effective than online.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpid.2025.23.3.72
Primary Topic
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections from a reflecting team: Systemic working in a community learning disability service

S. A. Simpson, Katie Kane
FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual Disabilities
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
article

Reflections from a reflecting team: Systemic working in a community learning disability service

S. A. Simpson, Katie Kane
article en

Abstract

Although there is a growing evidence base for systemic working with people with a learning disability, this primarily has been presented through case studies. This article will focus on the reflections gathered from a reflecting team to consider how systemic provision in a community learning disability service could be improved. Key findings from a 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis proposed that two-three reflectors in a reflecting team, alongside pre and post debrief sessions with easy-read leaflets to support these was helpful. Considerations were also given to whether the reflecting team online or in person encourages a full systemic experience, and how best to conduct systemic supervision is also discussed. The findings from this evaluation may be transferable to systemic provision more broadly. Easy to read summary ■ People with a learning disability often have a system around them. This system can include lots of different people such as their family, friends, partners, professionals or staff team. ■ Working with the system can help everyone to understand each other and work together to make things better. ■ Staff from a psychology team have shared their thoughts about how to make their work with systems better. ■ Providing support before, during and after this work with systems can be helpful for all involved. Also holding sessions face-to-face can be more effective than online.

FPID Bulletin The Bulletin of the Faculty for People with Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 23(3)
Simpson University (US), Kaneka (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.