Readiness and Perceptions of IPSAS 46 “Measurement” Implementation in Public Sector Entities: Evidence from Georgia

This article examines the challenges associated with implementing and applying the new valuation approaches introduced by IPSAS 46 in the public sector, specifically fair value and current operational value. The analysis is based on thematic survey data collected from professionals engaged in public sector accounting and reporting, as well as a diverse range of documentary sources. Although the study does not include a factor analysis and its conclusions are limited to the Georgian context, thematic grouping revealed key determinants influencing the implementation of IPSAS: professional competence, resource availability, and managerial attitudes towards development and perceived need. Additional situational limitations existed, as the study was conducted prior to the official translation of IPSAS 46 and its incorporation into the national guidance. Despite these constraints, the findings may hold relevance for other countries facing similar challenges of limited resources, professional capacity, and managerial attitudes. The study provides recommendations for integrating IPSAS 46 principles into local standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19010036
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Readiness and Perceptions of IPSAS 46 “Measurement” Implementation in Public Sector Entities: Evidence from Georgia

Mariam Vardiashvili, Marina Maisuradze, Levan Sabauri Levan Sabauri
Journal of risk and financial management
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Readiness and Perceptions of IPSAS 46 “Measurement” Implementation in Public Sector Entities: Evidence from Georgia

Mariam Vardiashvili, Marina Maisuradze, Levan Sabauri Levan Sabauri
article en

Abstract

This article examines the challenges associated with implementing and applying the new valuation approaches introduced by IPSAS 46 in the public sector, specifically fair value and current operational value. The analysis is based on thematic survey data collected from professionals engaged in public sector accounting and reporting, as well as a diverse range of documentary sources. Although the study does not include a factor analysis and its conclusions are limited to the Georgian context, thematic grouping revealed key determinants influencing the implementation of IPSAS: professional competence, resource availability, and managerial attitudes towards development and perceived need. Additional situational limitations existed, as the study was conducted prior to the official translation of IPSAS 46 and its incorporation into the national guidance. Despite these constraints, the findings may hold relevance for other countries facing similar challenges of limited resources, professional capacity, and managerial attitudes. The study provides recommendations for integrating IPSAS 46 principles into local standards.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(1)
Tbilisi State University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Readiness and Perceptions of IPSAS 46 “Measurement” Implementation in Public Sector Entities: Evidence from Georgia — Mariam Vardiashvili, Marina Maisuradze, et al. · Journal of risk and financial management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS