Parental and Children’s Preference of Full-Coverage Restorations on Primary Molars: A Cross-Sectional Study

<b>Aim</b>: This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate and compare parents' and children's preferences for full-coverage restorative treatment options of primary molars, including stainless steel crowns (SSCs), zirconia crowns (ZCs), and BioFlx crowns. Additionally, the study evaluates the influence of providing a brief overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each full-coverage restorative treatment option on parental preference. <b>Methods</b>: The study was conducted at the pediatric dental clinics at King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from January to May 2024. Healthy Arabic-speaking children aged 6-12 years attending KAUFD for routine dental treatment, along with at least one parent who agreed to participate, were included. Three typodont models with a SSC, a ZC, and a BioFlx crown were prepared and cemented by an expert pediatric dentist. The participating children and their parents were simultaneously and independently shown the prepared typodont models and asked to indicate which treatment option they preferred most. Subsequently, a trained pediatric dentist presented a brief overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment option to the parents. Then, parents were asked to re-evaluate their preferences. The threshold for significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: A total of 172 children and their parents were included. The most preferred full-coverage restorative treatment among children was SSC (39.0%), while among parents, ZC (60.5%) was the most preferred. After providing a brief overview, the most preferred option among parents was SSC (39.5%), with ZC and BioFlx crowns being equally preferred (30.2%). Significantly more children with no history of dental pain or discomfort (49.1%) (<i>p</i> = 0.023) or with a history of previous dental treatment involving SSC (40.2%) (<i>p</i> = 0.045) preferred SSC. The ZC was significantly more preferred by parents of female children (70.65%) (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and by parents of children with a history of dental treatment (60.6%) (<i>p</i> = 0.018). <b>Conclusions</b>: The study revealed that parental demands and expectations often differ from those of their children, leading to notable differences between children's and parents' preferences. After a brief overview, parental preference shifted from ZC to SSC, highlighting the importance of effective communication and education when making treatment decisions for pediatric patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13010081
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental and Children’s Preference of Full-Coverage Restorations on Primary Molars: A Cross-Sectional Study

Shahad N. Abudawood, Rahaf Sahhaf, Sara M. Bagher, Osama M. Felemban et al.
Children
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Parental and Children’s Preference of Full-Coverage Restorations on Primary Molars: A Cross-Sectional Study

Shahad N. Abudawood, Rahaf Sahhaf, Sara M. Bagher, Osama M. Felemban, Hanouf J. Alharbi, Hanan Alagl
article en

Abstract

<b>Aim</b>: This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate and compare parents' and children's preferences for full-coverage restorative treatment options of primary molars, including stainless steel crowns (SSCs), zirconia crowns (ZCs), and BioFlx crowns. Additionally, the study evaluates the influence of providing a brief overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each full-coverage restorative treatment option on parental preference. <b>Methods</b>: The study was conducted at the pediatric dental clinics at King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from January to May 2024. Healthy Arabic-speaking children aged 6-12 years attending KAUFD for routine dental treatment, along with at least one parent who agreed to participate, were included. Three typodont models with a SSC, a ZC, and a BioFlx crown were prepared and cemented by an expert pediatric dentist. The participating children and their parents were simultaneously and independently shown the prepared typodont models and asked to indicate which treatment option they preferred most. Subsequently, a trained pediatric dentist presented a brief overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment option to the parents. Then, parents were asked to re-evaluate their preferences. The threshold for significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: A total of 172 children and their parents were included. The most preferred full-coverage restorative treatment among children was SSC (39.0%), while among parents, ZC (60.5%) was the most preferred. After providing a brief overview, the most preferred option among parents was SSC (39.5%), with ZC and BioFlx crowns being equally preferred (30.2%). Significantly more children with no history of dental pain or discomfort (49.1%) (<i>p</i> = 0.023) or with a history of previous dental treatment involving SSC (40.2%) (<i>p</i> = 0.045) preferred SSC. The ZC was significantly more preferred by parents of female children (70.65%) (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and by parents of children with a history of dental treatment (60.6%) (<i>p</i> = 0.018). <b>Conclusions</b>: The study revealed that parental demands and expectations often differ from those of their children, leading to notable differences between children's and parents' preferences. After a brief overview, parental preference shifted from ZC to SSC, highlighting the importance of effective communication and education when making treatment decisions for pediatric patients.

ChildrenVol. 13(1)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Ministry of Health (SA)
King Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.