Smartphone Inclinometer–Measured Abdominal Tilt Angles for Classifying Diabetes and Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults: A Machine Learning Study

Background Abdominal obesity measures such as waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio have been shown to relate more closely to diabetes and musculoskeletal pain than body mass index, but conventional tape-based measurements are not easily scalable. A smartphone inclinometer application provides a practical alternative by capturing abdominal tilt angles that are automatically computed and easily reusable. Purpose This study assessed whether abdominal tilt angles measured using a smartphone inclinometer could serve as digital features for classifying diabetes and musculoskeletal pain in older adults using machine learning. Methods In 105 older adults, 12 abdominal inclination features were extracted from upper and lower tilt angles and refined by minimum redundancy maximum relevance selection. Three models (Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Balanced Random Forest (BalancedRF), and Linear Support Vector Classifier with Probability Calibration) were trained and evaluated with five-fold cross-validation. Results BalancedRF achieved the best performance for diabetes classification (accuracy = 0.83, ROC-AUC = 0.93, PR-AUC = 0.84), with sensitivity 87% and specificity 82%. For musculoskeletal pain, LightGBM achieved moderate performance (accuracy = 0.78, ROC-AUC = 0.83, PR-AUC = 0.56) but sensitivity was limited (53%) despite high specificity (87%). SHAP analysis highlighted the squared terms of the lower and total abdominal angles as key features for diabetes, while associations were weaker for pain. Conclusions Abdominal tilt angles measured by a smartphone inclinometer represent feasible, noninvasive digital features for diabetes risk stratification, although utility for musculoskeletal pain classification is limited. Future work should validate these findings in larger and longitudinal cohorts and explore real-world integration of smartphone posture monitoring for digital health applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Musculoskeletal Science and Technology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29273/jmst.2025.9.2.171
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smartphone Inclinometer–Measured Abdominal Tilt Angles for Classifying Diabetes and Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults: A Machine Learning Study

Kyue-nam Park Kyue-nam Park, Si-Hyun Kim, Young-Hyun Kwon
Journal of Musculoskeletal Science and Technology
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Smartphone Inclinometer–Measured Abdominal Tilt Angles for Classifying Diabetes and Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults: A Machine Learning Study

Kyue-nam Park Kyue-nam Park, Si-Hyun Kim, Young-Hyun Kwon
article en

Abstract

Background Abdominal obesity measures such as waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio have been shown to relate more closely to diabetes and musculoskeletal pain than body mass index, but conventional tape-based measurements are not easily scalable. A smartphone inclinometer application provides a practical alternative by capturing abdominal tilt angles that are automatically computed and easily reusable. Purpose This study assessed whether abdominal tilt angles measured using a smartphone inclinometer could serve as digital features for classifying diabetes and musculoskeletal pain in older adults using machine learning. Methods In 105 older adults, 12 abdominal inclination features were extracted from upper and lower tilt angles and refined by minimum redundancy maximum relevance selection. Three models (Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Balanced Random Forest (BalancedRF), and Linear Support Vector Classifier with Probability Calibration) were trained and evaluated with five-fold cross-validation. Results BalancedRF achieved the best performance for diabetes classification (accuracy = 0.83, ROC-AUC = 0.93, PR-AUC = 0.84), with sensitivity 87% and specificity 82%. For musculoskeletal pain, LightGBM achieved moderate performance (accuracy = 0.78, ROC-AUC = 0.83, PR-AUC = 0.56) but sensitivity was limited (53%) despite high specificity (87%). SHAP analysis highlighted the squared terms of the lower and total abdominal angles as key features for diabetes, while associations were weaker for pain. Conclusions Abdominal tilt angles measured by a smartphone inclinometer represent feasible, noninvasive digital features for diabetes risk stratification, although utility for musculoskeletal pain classification is limited. Future work should validate these findings in larger and longitudinal cohorts and explore real-world integration of smartphone posture monitoring for digital health applications.

Journal of Musculoskeletal Science and TechnologyVol. 9(2)
Yonsei University
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.