Letter to the Editor: Redesigning mental health support for youth – early interventions need to move away from the diagnostic model

The recent stimulating debate series in CAMH has highlighted how efforts to raise mental health awareness have resulted in a paradox: overpathologisation is a concern, and yet timely recognition and access to evidence-based support remain insufficient. Often those who need help most are least likely to access it. In response, I extend on the solutions offered by Gega et al. I contend that especially where supports and interventions are intended for use at early help stage, we should reconsider the use of diagnostic framing. Rather than describing interventions using diagnostic terms like depression and anxiety, we should use normalising language to describe these supports. To illustrate, I offer an example of a suite of self-guided single-session interventions (SSIs), not framed in diagnostic language but instead developed to be normalising. This reduces potential harm from requiring individuals to identify with a specific diagnostic construct to see such interventions as relevant to and suitable for them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70062
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letter to the Editor: Redesigning mental health support for youth – early interventions need to move away from the diagnostic model

Maria Elizabeth Loades
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

Letter to the Editor: Redesigning mental health support for youth – early interventions need to move away from the diagnostic model

Maria Elizabeth Loades
article en

Abstract

The recent stimulating debate series in CAMH has highlighted how efforts to raise mental health awareness have resulted in a paradox: overpathologisation is a concern, and yet timely recognition and access to evidence-based support remain insufficient. Often those who need help most are least likely to access it. In response, I extend on the solutions offered by Gega et al. I contend that especially where supports and interventions are intended for use at early help stage, we should reconsider the use of diagnostic framing. Rather than describing interventions using diagnostic terms like depression and anxiety, we should use normalising language to describe these supports. To illustrate, I offer an example of a suite of self-guided single-session interventions (SSIs), not framed in diagnostic language but instead developed to be normalising. This reduces potential harm from requiring individuals to identify with a specific diagnostic construct to see such interventions as relevant to and suitable for them.

Child and Adolescent Mental Health
University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Letter to the Editor: Redesigning mental health support for youth – early interventions need to move away from the diagnostic model — Maria Elizabeth Loades · Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS