Effect of Maternal Table Tilt During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia on Norepinephrine Requirements: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study

<b>Background:</b> Left lateral tilt is traditionally recommended during cesarean delivery to reduce aortocaval compression and maintain maternal hemodynamic stability; however, with the widespread adoption of prophylactic vasopressor strategies recommended by current guidelines, the incremental benefit of routine tilt remains uncertain. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized observational comparative study at the University Hospital Bratislava including 99 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Participants were managed either with a standard ~15° left lateral tilt (<i>n</i> = 41) or in a flat supine position without tilt (<i>n</i> = 58), according to the day of surgery and routine anesthesiologist practice; all other anesthetic and surgical procedures were identical. A prophylactic norepinephrine infusion was initiated at 0.05 µg/kg/min and titrated to maintain systolic arterial pressure at 90-100% of baseline. The primary outcome was the average norepinephrine infusion rate (µg/kg/min) from induction of spinal anesthesia to neonatal delivery. Secondary outcomes included total norepinephrine dose to delivery, dose normalized per kilogram, and neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas parameters). <b>Results:</b> The median norepinephrine infusion rate was 0.03 µg/kg/min in both groups (tilt: IQR 0.01-0.04 vs. no-tilt: IQR 0.02-0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.325). Total norepinephrine dose to delivery (20 [15-35] µg; <i>p</i> = 0.89) and dose per kilogram (0.25 [0.15-0.33] µg/kg vs. 0.34 [0.17-0.44] µg/kg; <i>p</i> = 0.10) were also comparable. Neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas parameters, did not differ significantly between groups. In a multivariable regression sensitivity analysis adjusting for maternal and procedural covariates, table tilt was not independently associated with norepinephrine requirements. <b>Conclusions:</b> In parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with prophylactic norepinephrine infusion, a 15° left lateral tilt did not reduce vasopressor requirements or improve neonatal outcomes. Routine maternal tilt therefore appears unnecessary for hemodynamic optimization in this setting, and patient positioning can be individualized without compromising maternal or neonatal safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14010117
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Maternal Table Tilt During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia on Norepinephrine Requirements: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study

Peter Sabaka, Jakub Vallo, Jana Morávková, Matúš Paulíny
Healthcare
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Effect of Maternal Table Tilt During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia on Norepinephrine Requirements: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study

Peter Sabaka, Jakub Vallo, Jana Morávková, Matúš Paulíny
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Left lateral tilt is traditionally recommended during cesarean delivery to reduce aortocaval compression and maintain maternal hemodynamic stability; however, with the widespread adoption of prophylactic vasopressor strategies recommended by current guidelines, the incremental benefit of routine tilt remains uncertain. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized observational comparative study at the University Hospital Bratislava including 99 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Participants were managed either with a standard ~15° left lateral tilt (<i>n</i> = 41) or in a flat supine position without tilt (<i>n</i> = 58), according to the day of surgery and routine anesthesiologist practice; all other anesthetic and surgical procedures were identical. A prophylactic norepinephrine infusion was initiated at 0.05 µg/kg/min and titrated to maintain systolic arterial pressure at 90-100% of baseline. The primary outcome was the average norepinephrine infusion rate (µg/kg/min) from induction of spinal anesthesia to neonatal delivery. Secondary outcomes included total norepinephrine dose to delivery, dose normalized per kilogram, and neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas parameters). <b>Results:</b> The median norepinephrine infusion rate was 0.03 µg/kg/min in both groups (tilt: IQR 0.01-0.04 vs. no-tilt: IQR 0.02-0.04; <i>p</i> = 0.325). Total norepinephrine dose to delivery (20 [15-35] µg; <i>p</i> = 0.89) and dose per kilogram (0.25 [0.15-0.33] µg/kg vs. 0.34 [0.17-0.44] µg/kg; <i>p</i> = 0.10) were also comparable. Neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores and umbilical arterial blood gas parameters, did not differ significantly between groups. In a multivariable regression sensitivity analysis adjusting for maternal and procedural covariates, table tilt was not independently associated with norepinephrine requirements. <b>Conclusions:</b> In parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with prophylactic norepinephrine infusion, a 15° left lateral tilt did not reduce vasopressor requirements or improve neonatal outcomes. Routine maternal tilt therefore appears unnecessary for hemodynamic optimization in this setting, and patient positioning can be individualized without compromising maternal or neonatal safety.

HealthcareVol. 14(1)
Slovak Medical University (SK), University Hospital Bratislava (SK), Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.