Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation

The deployment of autonomous systems in human environments demands sophisticated mechanisms for recognizing and preventing harm. This paper proposes an innovative discovery method for identifying harm-relevant features through the systematic analysis of thick harm verbs—semantically and pragmatically rich linguistic concepts like “puncture”, “crush”, or “poison” that encode both the mechanics and normative evaluations of specific harm types. By analyzing thick harm verbs to extract the information they encode, we can systematically identify the objects, properties, mechanisms, and contextual conditions that autonomous systems need to track to recognize and prevent harm. We demonstrate how this discovery method can be implemented with the support of large language models as analytical assistance tools, showing how human analysts can operationalize the framework with current technology. The resulting feature specifications discovered through this method provide foundations for constructing harm ontologies that bridge abstract ethical principles and concrete system requirements, addressing a critical gap in autonomous systems design while maintaining explanatory transparency essential for safe deployment in human environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge6010003
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation

Ariel M. Greenberg, Joseph Jebari
Knowledge
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation

Ariel M. Greenberg, Joseph Jebari
article en

Abstract

The deployment of autonomous systems in human environments demands sophisticated mechanisms for recognizing and preventing harm. This paper proposes an innovative discovery method for identifying harm-relevant features through the systematic analysis of thick harm verbs—semantically and pragmatically rich linguistic concepts like “puncture”, “crush”, or “poison” that encode both the mechanics and normative evaluations of specific harm types. By analyzing thick harm verbs to extract the information they encode, we can systematically identify the objects, properties, mechanisms, and contextual conditions that autonomous systems need to track to recognize and prevent harm. We demonstrate how this discovery method can be implemented with the support of large language models as analytical assistance tools, showing how human analysts can operationalize the framework with current technology. The resulting feature specifications discovered through this method provide foundations for constructing harm ontologies that bridge abstract ethical principles and concrete system requirements, addressing a critical gap in autonomous systems design while maintaining explanatory transparency essential for safe deployment in human environments.

KnowledgeVol. 6(1)
Howard University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine Understanding of Harms: Theory and Implementation — Ariel M. Greenberg, Joseph Jebari · Knowledge (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS