A Critical Approach to the Diagnostic Work-Up of Suspected Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: Integrated Reports, Technical Pitfalls and the Role of Artificial Intelligence

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) traditionally relies on cytomorphological assessment of peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM). Despite recent shifts toward molecular testing and next-generation sequencing, blast percentage and dysplasia remain integral to the initial work-up. Morphology provides immediate availability and cost-effectiveness but is hindered by interobserver variability, lack of standardization and declining training in classical hematology. These factors may complicate the differentiation of MDS from non-clonal cytopenias or therapy-related changes. Technical quality of BM sampling and processing is crucial, as inadequate core length, improper fixation or artifacts may obscure interpretation. Digital morphology and artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping hematology by reducing subjectivity, improving reproducibility and enabling remote consultation, training and archiving. Although automated analyzers demonstrate high accuracy for common cell types, expert oversight remains essential, especially for rare or pathological cells. AI and machine learning (ML) extend across diagnostic modalities, from detecting dysplasia in PB and BM smears to automating flow cytometry gating, karyotyping and variant analysis. These approaches can differentiate MDS from aplastic anemia or acute myeloid leukemia with high accuracy, although generalizability is limited by small datasets, technical variability and insufficient external validation. Ethical, regulatory and educational challenges persist, underscoring the need for explainable models and clinician AI literacy. PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE **Peer reviewers:** Prof. Dr Ulrich Germing, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany Prof. Dr Alexandar Tzankov, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Received on September 29, 2025; accepted after peer review on November 14, 2025; published online on November 25, 2025.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36000/hbt.oh.2025.26.193
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Approach to the Diagnostic Work-Up of Suspected Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: Integrated Reports, Technical Pitfalls and the Role of Artificial Intelligence

Parmentier
healthbook TIMES Oncology Hematology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

A Critical Approach to the Diagnostic Work-Up of Suspected Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: Integrated Reports, Technical Pitfalls and the Role of Artificial Intelligence

Parmentier
article en

Abstract

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) traditionally relies on cytomorphological assessment of peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM). Despite recent shifts toward molecular testing and next-generation sequencing, blast percentage and dysplasia remain integral to the initial work-up. Morphology provides immediate availability and cost-effectiveness but is hindered by interobserver variability, lack of standardization and declining training in classical hematology. These factors may complicate the differentiation of MDS from non-clonal cytopenias or therapy-related changes. Technical quality of BM sampling and processing is crucial, as inadequate core length, improper fixation or artifacts may obscure interpretation. Digital morphology and artificial intelligence (AI) are reshaping hematology by reducing subjectivity, improving reproducibility and enabling remote consultation, training and archiving. Although automated analyzers demonstrate high accuracy for common cell types, expert oversight remains essential, especially for rare or pathological cells. AI and machine learning (ML) extend across diagnostic modalities, from detecting dysplasia in PB and BM smears to automating flow cytometry gating, karyotyping and variant analysis. These approaches can differentiate MDS from aplastic anemia or acute myeloid leukemia with high accuracy, although generalizability is limited by small datasets, technical variability and insufficient external validation. Ethical, regulatory and educational challenges persist, underscoring the need for explainable models and clinician AI literacy. PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE **Peer reviewers:** Prof. Dr Ulrich Germing, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany Prof. Dr Alexandar Tzankov, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Received on September 29, 2025; accepted after peer review on November 14, 2025; published online on November 25, 2025.

healthbook TIMES Oncology HematologyVol. 26(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.