Differential Analysis of Metacognitive Regulation in Students with Different Levels of Intellectual Development

The study examines differences in the manifestations of metacognitive regulation among students demonstrating varying levels of intellectual development. The research aims to identify the nature of relationships between its key components and to establish intergroup distinctions. The sample consisted of 89 respondents. To achieve the objectives of the study, the following methods were used: theoretical literature analysis, diagnostic methods such as testing and computer-based assessment, as well as mathematical and statistical data processing methods (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r, Student’s t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U-test). Statistical processing included the calculation of Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Student’s t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U-test. The analysis revealed a stable relationship between cognitive functions and metacognitive regulation, the nature of which depends on the level of intellectual development. Students with high IQ scores demonstrated pronounced direct and indirect relationships between indicators of intelligence, analytical thinking, self-monitoring ability, and cognitive flexibility. Among students with average IQ levels, the key factors were the ability to identify main ideas and to reduce susceptibility to proactive interference. Intergroup analysis revealed significant differences only on the “Information Acquisition” scale, reflecting the advantage of high-IQ students in using strategies for primary material assimilation, while overall metacognitive patterns remained similar. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive analysis of metacognitive regulation considering the level of intelligence, as well as in combining correlational analysis with intergroup comparisons. The obtained results have practical significance and can be applied in the development of individualized educational strategies aimed at enhancing metacognitive skills and improving academic success among students with different levels of intellectual ability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Психология и Психотехника
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0722.2025.4.76210
Primary Topic
Psychology of Development and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Analysis of Metacognitive Regulation in Students with Different Levels of Intellectual Development

YUliya Alekseevna Smetanina
Психология и Психотехника
Psychology of Development and Education
article

Differential Analysis of Metacognitive Regulation in Students with Different Levels of Intellectual Development

YUliya Alekseevna Smetanina
article en

Abstract

The study examines differences in the manifestations of metacognitive regulation among students demonstrating varying levels of intellectual development. The research aims to identify the nature of relationships between its key components and to establish intergroup distinctions. The sample consisted of 89 respondents. To achieve the objectives of the study, the following methods were used: theoretical literature analysis, diagnostic methods such as testing and computer-based assessment, as well as mathematical and statistical data processing methods (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r, Student’s t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U-test). Statistical processing included the calculation of Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Student’s t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U-test. The analysis revealed a stable relationship between cognitive functions and metacognitive regulation, the nature of which depends on the level of intellectual development. Students with high IQ scores demonstrated pronounced direct and indirect relationships between indicators of intelligence, analytical thinking, self-monitoring ability, and cognitive flexibility. Among students with average IQ levels, the key factors were the ability to identify main ideas and to reduce susceptibility to proactive interference. Intergroup analysis revealed significant differences only on the “Information Acquisition” scale, reflecting the advantage of high-IQ students in using strategies for primary material assimilation, while overall metacognitive patterns remained similar. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive analysis of metacognitive regulation considering the level of intelligence, as well as in combining correlational analysis with intergroup comparisons. The obtained results have practical significance and can be applied in the development of individualized educational strategies aimed at enhancing metacognitive skills and improving academic success among students with different levels of intellectual ability.

Психология и Психотехника(4)
Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Psychology of Development and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.