Endowment Inequality in Common Pool Resource Games: An Experimental Analysis
This work addresses whether heterogeneity in player endowments influences investment decisions in common pool resource (CPR) games, shedding light on the relationship between inequality and economic decision making. We explore two theoretical avenues from behavioral economics—linear other-regarding preferences and inequity aversion—and examine the predictions of each with a laboratory experiment. Our experimental results roundly reject the majority of these explanations: in treatments with endowment inequality, high endowment individuals invest more in the common pool resource than low endowment individuals. We discuss these results in the context of the literature on psychological entitlement and positional preferences.
Authors
- Andrew Monaco
- Garrett Milam
Institutions
- University of Puget Sound (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Games
- Published
- 2026-01-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/g17010001
- Primary Topic
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00