Gravitational trapping and ram pressure trapping of ultracompact and hypercompact H II regions

Context . Early H II regions are observationally classified by size into ultracompact and hypercompact configurations. It remains unclear whether these phases are long-lived or transient. Understanding the physical processes that stall H II region growth may help to solve the “lifetime problem”: the observation of more compact H II regions than expected from theory. Aims . Utilizing two-dimensional, axially symmetric radiation hydrodynamic simulations of young expanding H II regions, including early star and disk formation, we seek to better understand the trapping of H II regions. Trapping forces include gravity and ram pressure, which oppose forces such as thermal pressure expansion, radiation pressure, and centrifugal force. Methods . We used the open-source magnetohydrodynamical code Pluto , the radiation transport module Makemake , the photoionization module Sedna , and the self-gravity module Haumea . This approach resembles the setup of previous works, but without the manual injection of protostellar outflows. Results . Without radiation pressure, the H II region remains gravitationally trapped in the ultracompact phase indefinitely. With radiation pressure, the H II region escapes gravitational trapping but experiences ram pressure trapping on larger scales. For initial mass reservoirs with a high central density, no trapping occurs, while a less steep density gradient yields clear trapped phases. Hypercompact trapped phases exhibit a “flickering” variation in H II region radius, in agreement with observations of stalling and even contraction over small timescales. With radiation pressure, low-mass or low-density reservoirs experience both gravitational and ram pressure trapping, while high-mass reservoirs undergo only the latter. Conclusions . During the early evolution of H II regions, gravitational and ram pressure trapping may occur at different times and distances from the (proto)star, depending on environmental conditions. The mean expansion velocity is influenced by thermal pressure, gravity, centrifugal forces, and radiation pressure. For the cases studied herein, the inclusion of radiation pressure is crucial to obtaining physically meaningful results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452577
Primary Topic
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gravitational trapping and ram pressure trapping of ultracompact and hypercompact H II regions

R. Kuiper, L. Martini, A. Oliva, P. Klaassen
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
article

Gravitational trapping and ram pressure trapping of ultracompact and hypercompact H II regions

R. Kuiper, L. Martini, A. Oliva, P. Klaassen
article en

Abstract

Context . Early H II regions are observationally classified by size into ultracompact and hypercompact configurations. It remains unclear whether these phases are long-lived or transient. Understanding the physical processes that stall H II region growth may help to solve the “lifetime problem”: the observation of more compact H II regions than expected from theory. Aims . Utilizing two-dimensional, axially symmetric radiation hydrodynamic simulations of young expanding H II regions, including early star and disk formation, we seek to better understand the trapping of H II regions. Trapping forces include gravity and ram pressure, which oppose forces such as thermal pressure expansion, radiation pressure, and centrifugal force. Methods . We used the open-source magnetohydrodynamical code Pluto , the radiation transport module Makemake , the photoionization module Sedna , and the self-gravity module Haumea . This approach resembles the setup of previous works, but without the manual injection of protostellar outflows. Results . Without radiation pressure, the H II region remains gravitationally trapped in the ultracompact phase indefinitely. With radiation pressure, the H II region escapes gravitational trapping but experiences ram pressure trapping on larger scales. For initial mass reservoirs with a high central density, no trapping occurs, while a less steep density gradient yields clear trapped phases. Hypercompact trapped phases exhibit a “flickering” variation in H II region radius, in agreement with observations of stalling and even contraction over small timescales. With radiation pressure, low-mass or low-density reservoirs experience both gravitational and ram pressure trapping, while high-mass reservoirs undergo only the latter. Conclusions . During the early evolution of H II regions, gravitational and ram pressure trapping may occur at different times and distances from the (proto)star, depending on environmental conditions. The mean expansion velocity is influenced by thermal pressure, gravity, centrifugal forces, and radiation pressure. For the cases studied herein, the inclusion of radiation pressure is crucial to obtaining physically meaningful results.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 706
University of Geneva (CH), Universidad de Costa Rica (CR), Royal Observatory (GB), UK Astronomy Technology Centre (GB), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.