Quantifying the cost savings of the South Australian Telestroke Service

BackgroundFew studies have explored the cost and clinical impacts of enhanced telehealth interventions for stroke in contemporaneous practice. As such, we sought to compare the cost-effectiveness of a clinical service supported by a purpose built platform for stroke telehealth in South Australia.MethodsMarkov decision analytic models were constructed to model the implementation of an enhanced telehealth programme versus historical controls with limited referral support. The models were profiled on a minimum dataset of 470 patients with stroke symptoms presenting across eight regional/rural hospitals in South Australia. Clinical outcomes and costs were derived from published sources. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the telehealth platform over a lifetime time horizon, from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system compared with a historical control.ResultsImplementation of the South Australia Telestroke programme was associated with a gain of 0.10 quality-adjusted life years and a cost saving of $3873 per patient. That is, over a 5-year period, the introduction of technology-enabled telehealth resulted in a total projected cost saving of $8.7 million (M). This was driven by a reduction in the costs attributed to management (per patient -$2676; total projected: -$6.0 M), nursing home care (per patient: -$3268; total projected: -$7.3 M), non-medical costs (per patient: -$510; total projected: -$1.1 M) and futile transfers (per patient: -$111; total projected: -$250,248), which offset higher intervention costs (per patient: $2674; total projected: $6.0 M) and hospital costs (per patient: $18; total projected: $41,092). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.ConclusionThe implementation of an enhanced telehealth programme improves patient outcomes and is cost-saving relative to a telestroke programme with limited referral support. Our findings support ongoing implementation of the enhanced telehealth programme across South Australian hospitals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x251389689
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the cost savings of the South Australian Telestroke Service

Jim Jannes, Andrew Bivard, Jackson D. Harvey, Matthew Willcourt et al.
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Quantifying the cost savings of the South Australian Telestroke Service

Jim Jannes, Andrew Bivard, Jackson D. Harvey, Matthew Willcourt, Aaron Tan, Karen Dixon, Craig Kurunawai, S. Davis, Joshua Mahadevan, Bianca Piantedosi, Joanne Van Eunen, Lan Gao, Peter Lee, Michael Waters, Geoffery Donnan, Timothy Kleinig
article en

Abstract

BackgroundFew studies have explored the cost and clinical impacts of enhanced telehealth interventions for stroke in contemporaneous practice. As such, we sought to compare the cost-effectiveness of a clinical service supported by a purpose built platform for stroke telehealth in South Australia.MethodsMarkov decision analytic models were constructed to model the implementation of an enhanced telehealth programme versus historical controls with limited referral support. The models were profiled on a minimum dataset of 470 patients with stroke symptoms presenting across eight regional/rural hospitals in South Australia. Clinical outcomes and costs were derived from published sources. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the telehealth platform over a lifetime time horizon, from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system compared with a historical control.ResultsImplementation of the South Australia Telestroke programme was associated with a gain of 0.10 quality-adjusted life years and a cost saving of $3873 per patient. That is, over a 5-year period, the introduction of technology-enabled telehealth resulted in a total projected cost saving of $8.7 million (M). This was driven by a reduction in the costs attributed to management (per patient -$2676; total projected: -$6.0 M), nursing home care (per patient: -$3268; total projected: -$7.3 M), non-medical costs (per patient: -$510; total projected: -$1.1 M) and futile transfers (per patient: -$111; total projected: -$250,248), which offset higher intervention costs (per patient: $2674; total projected: $6.0 M) and hospital costs (per patient: $18; total projected: $41,092). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.ConclusionThe implementation of an enhanced telehealth programme improves patient outcomes and is cost-saving relative to a telestroke programme with limited referral support. Our findings support ongoing implementation of the enhanced telehealth programme across South Australian hospitals.

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders Medical Centre (AU), Health Net (US), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.