Explaining Two Different Traditional Estimates of the Generic Diversity of Brachiopods at the Oligocene–Miocene Transition

The present work reconsiders our current knowledge of the presence of brachiopod genera in the Chattian and Aquitanian stages (late Oligocene and Early Miocene, respectively). Two of the most important sources of paleontological information were used. The uncertain presence of taxa in the particular stages was recorded. The results indicated that the total number of brachiopod genera in the Chattian and the Aquitanian was generally the same, irrespective of the chosen dataset. If so, the short-term paleoenvironmental perturbations did not affect the generic diversity of brachiopods. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the presently available, traditional estimates of the generic diversity of brachiopods. However, further critical consideration and improvement of the data and application of some advanced analytical tools is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16010029
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining Two Different Traditional Estimates of the Generic Diversity of Brachiopods at the Oligocene–Miocene Transition

Dmitry A. Ruban
Geosciences
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
article

Explaining Two Different Traditional Estimates of the Generic Diversity of Brachiopods at the Oligocene–Miocene Transition

Dmitry A. Ruban
article en

Abstract

The present work reconsiders our current knowledge of the presence of brachiopod genera in the Chattian and Aquitanian stages (late Oligocene and Early Miocene, respectively). Two of the most important sources of paleontological information were used. The uncertain presence of taxa in the particular stages was recorded. The results indicated that the total number of brachiopod genera in the Chattian and the Aquitanian was generally the same, irrespective of the chosen dataset. If so, the short-term paleoenvironmental perturbations did not affect the generic diversity of brachiopods. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the presently available, traditional estimates of the generic diversity of brachiopods. However, further critical consideration and improvement of the data and application of some advanced analytical tools is needed.

GeosciencesVol. 16(1)
Southern Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.