Optimal Ice Particle Models of Different Cloud Types for Radiative Transfer Simulation at 183 GHz Frequency Band

The Fengyun-4 microwave satellite provides high-temporal-frequency observations at the 183 GHz band, providing unprecedented data for all-weather, three-dimensional measurements of atmospheric parameters. It is of importance to establish a simulated brightness temperature (BT) dataset for this band prior to launch, which can support the relevant quantitative applications significantly. Compared with clear-sky conditions, the accuracy of BT simulations under cloudy ones is considerably lower, primarily due to the influence of the adopted ice particle models. Up until now, few studies have systematically investigated ice particle model selection for different cloud types at the 183 GHz frequency band. In this paper, multi-sensor observations from Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR), Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) were used as realistic atmospheric profiles. Using the high-precision radiative transfer model Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator (ARTS), BT simulations at 183 GHz were performed to explore the optimal ice particle models for seven classical cloud types. The main conclusions are given as follows: (1) The sensitivity of simulated cloud radiances to ice particle habits differs with respect to different cloud phases. For altocumulus (Ac), stratocumulus (Sc), and cumulus (Cu) clouds, the different choices of ice particle model have little impacts on the simulated brightness temperatures (<1 K), with RMSEs below 3 K across multiple models, indicating that various models can be applied directly for such simulations. (2) For some mixed-phase clouds, including altostratus (As), nimbostratus (Ns), and deep convective (Dc) clouds, the Small Block Aggregate (SBA) and Small Plate Aggregate (SPA) models demonstrate good performance for As clouds, with RMSEs below 2.5 K, while the SBA, SPA, and Large Column Aggregate (LCA) models exhibit similarly good performance for Ns clouds, also achieving RMSEs below 2.5 K. For Dc clouds, although the SBA model yields RMSEs of approximately 10 K, it still provides a substantial improvement over the spherical model, whereas for cirrus (Ci) clouds, any non-spherical ice particle models are applicable, with RMSEs below 2 K. (3) Within the 183 GHz frequency band, channels with the higher weighting-function peaks are less sensitive to variable adoptions of ice particle models. These results offer valuable references for accurate radiative transfer simulations on 183 GHz frequency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010168
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Ice Particle Models of Different Cloud Types for Radiative Transfer Simulation at 183 GHz Frequency Band

Fangli Dou, W. Hui, Xin Wang, Qiang Guo et al.
Remote Sensing
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Optimal Ice Particle Models of Different Cloud Types for Radiative Transfer Simulation at 183 GHz Frequency Band

Fangli Dou, W. Hui, Xin Wang, Qiang Guo, Zhuoyang Li, Yiyu Chen
article en

Abstract

The Fengyun-4 microwave satellite provides high-temporal-frequency observations at the 183 GHz band, providing unprecedented data for all-weather, three-dimensional measurements of atmospheric parameters. It is of importance to establish a simulated brightness temperature (BT) dataset for this band prior to launch, which can support the relevant quantitative applications significantly. Compared with clear-sky conditions, the accuracy of BT simulations under cloudy ones is considerably lower, primarily due to the influence of the adopted ice particle models. Up until now, few studies have systematically investigated ice particle model selection for different cloud types at the 183 GHz frequency band. In this paper, multi-sensor observations from Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR), Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP), and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) were used as realistic atmospheric profiles. Using the high-precision radiative transfer model Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator (ARTS), BT simulations at 183 GHz were performed to explore the optimal ice particle models for seven classical cloud types. The main conclusions are given as follows: (1) The sensitivity of simulated cloud radiances to ice particle habits differs with respect to different cloud phases. For altocumulus (Ac), stratocumulus (Sc), and cumulus (Cu) clouds, the different choices of ice particle model have little impacts on the simulated brightness temperatures (<1 K), with RMSEs below 3 K across multiple models, indicating that various models can be applied directly for such simulations. (2) For some mixed-phase clouds, including altostratus (As), nimbostratus (Ns), and deep convective (Dc) clouds, the Small Block Aggregate (SBA) and Small Plate Aggregate (SPA) models demonstrate good performance for As clouds, with RMSEs below 2.5 K, while the SBA, SPA, and Large Column Aggregate (LCA) models exhibit similarly good performance for Ns clouds, also achieving RMSEs below 2.5 K. For Dc clouds, although the SBA model yields RMSEs of approximately 10 K, it still provides a substantial improvement over the spherical model, whereas for cirrus (Ci) clouds, any non-spherical ice particle models are applicable, with RMSEs below 2 K. (3) Within the 183 GHz frequency band, channels with the higher weighting-function peaks are less sensitive to variable adoptions of ice particle models. These results offer valuable references for accurate radiative transfer simulations on 183 GHz frequency.

Remote SensingVol. 18(1)
China Meteorological Administration (CN), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CN), Beijing Meteorological Bureau (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.