From Data to Autonomy: Integrating Demographic Factors and AI Models for Expert-Free Exercise Coaching

This study investigates the performance of three deep learning architectures—LSTM with Attention, GRU with Attention, and Transformer—in the context of real-time, self-guided exercise classification, using coordinate data collected from 103 participants via a dual-camera system. Each model was evaluated over ten randomized runs to ensure robustness and statistical validity. The GRU + Attention and LSTM + Attention models demonstrated consistently high test accuracy (mean ≈ 98.9%), while the Transformer model yielded significantly lower accuracy (mean ≈ 96.6%) with greater variance. Paired t-tests confirmed that the difference between LSTM and GRU models was not statistically significant (p = 0.9249), while both models significantly outperformed the Transformer architecture (p < 0.01). In addition, participant-specific features, such as athletic experience and BMI, were found to affect classification accuracy. These findings support the feasibility of AI-based feedback systems in enhancing unsupervised training, offering a scalable solution to bridge the gap between expert supervision and autonomous physical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010488
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Data to Autonomy: Integrating Demographic Factors and AI Models for Expert-Free Exercise Coaching

Özgür Can Turna, Uğur Özbalkan
Applied Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
article

From Data to Autonomy: Integrating Demographic Factors and AI Models for Expert-Free Exercise Coaching

Özgür Can Turna, Uğur Özbalkan
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of three deep learning architectures—LSTM with Attention, GRU with Attention, and Transformer—in the context of real-time, self-guided exercise classification, using coordinate data collected from 103 participants via a dual-camera system. Each model was evaluated over ten randomized runs to ensure robustness and statistical validity. The GRU + Attention and LSTM + Attention models demonstrated consistently high test accuracy (mean ≈ 98.9%), while the Transformer model yielded significantly lower accuracy (mean ≈ 96.6%) with greater variance. Paired t-tests confirmed that the difference between LSTM and GRU models was not statistically significant (p = 0.9249), while both models significantly outperformed the Transformer architecture (p < 0.01). In addition, participant-specific features, such as athletic experience and BMI, were found to affect classification accuracy. These findings support the feasibility of AI-based feedback systems in enhancing unsupervised training, offering a scalable solution to bridge the gap between expert supervision and autonomous physical practice.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(1)
Fenerbahçe University (TR), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.