The riskiness of Gaza in the classroom: the experiences of UK teachers during an unfolding human rights crisis

In October 2023, Israel invaded Gaza after an attack by Hamas, the repercussions of which reached classrooms across the world. This paper reports on a study conducted in May-July 2024 with secondary school teachers in the United Kingdom through a qualitative survey and interviews. The findings highlight that teachers often construct the discussion of Gaza as risky, and face barriers including expectations of neutrality; concerns surrounding knowledge; and varying institutional approaches, including explicit bans leading to ‘directive avoidance’. I argue that using a human rights framework and viewing the situation in Gaza as a human rights issue can shift what is often felt as individual problems and personal risk-management to a shared, principled approach. Even what might be considered modest engagement with human rights values, such as through cultural events or fundraising, can be viewed as radical in a context where any form of action can be considered contentious.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Education Review
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25355406.2025.2605315
Primary Topic
Peace and Human Rights Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The riskiness of Gaza in the classroom: the experiences of UK teachers during an unfolding human rights crisis

Anna Liddle
Human Rights Education Review
Peace and Human Rights Education
article

The riskiness of Gaza in the classroom: the experiences of UK teachers during an unfolding human rights crisis

Anna Liddle
article en

Abstract

In October 2023, Israel invaded Gaza after an attack by Hamas, the repercussions of which reached classrooms across the world. This paper reports on a study conducted in May-July 2024 with secondary school teachers in the United Kingdom through a qualitative survey and interviews. The findings highlight that teachers often construct the discussion of Gaza as risky, and face barriers including expectations of neutrality; concerns surrounding knowledge; and varying institutional approaches, including explicit bans leading to ‘directive avoidance’. I argue that using a human rights framework and viewing the situation in Gaza as a human rights issue can shift what is often felt as individual problems and personal risk-management to a shared, principled approach. Even what might be considered modest engagement with human rights values, such as through cultural events or fundraising, can be viewed as radical in a context where any form of action can be considered contentious.

Human Rights Education ReviewVol. 9(1)
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Peace and Human Rights Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The riskiness of Gaza in the classroom: the experiences of UK teachers during an unfolding human rights crisis — Anna Liddle · Human Rights Education Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS