The Evangelistic Imperative and the Modernity of Knowledge Production: Tibetology at the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1857–1952

The Tibetological research of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (NCBRAS) traces a historical process by which a missionary-led membership drove shifts in Tibetological knowledge production and research paradigms, thereby exposing the constitutive tensions of its modernization. In the nineteenth century, the Society operated under a triad of aims—evangelization, empire, and scholarship—and oriented its output toward the Western world. Its Tibetology bore a marked Orientalist imprint. After 1900, missionary members such as J. H. Edgar and T. Torrance introduced modern disciplinary methods, including anthropology, into Tibetological study, placing the field on a more scientific and professional footing. Yet this transformation was simultaneously shaped by colonial politics and the Christian missionary enterprise. Even as the Society secularized in the 1920s, missionary research continued to serve evangelistic ends. Taken together, the trajectory of NCBRAS Tibetology offers a microcosm of missionary knowledge production in modern China and illuminates the interplay among mission, empire, and scholarship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010055
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evangelistic Imperative and the Modernity of Knowledge Production: Tibetology at the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1857–1952

Peirong Li, Libin Xiong
Religions
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

The Evangelistic Imperative and the Modernity of Knowledge Production: Tibetology at the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1857–1952

Peirong Li, Libin Xiong
article en

Abstract

The Tibetological research of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (NCBRAS) traces a historical process by which a missionary-led membership drove shifts in Tibetological knowledge production and research paradigms, thereby exposing the constitutive tensions of its modernization. In the nineteenth century, the Society operated under a triad of aims—evangelization, empire, and scholarship—and oriented its output toward the Western world. Its Tibetology bore a marked Orientalist imprint. After 1900, missionary members such as J. H. Edgar and T. Torrance introduced modern disciplinary methods, including anthropology, into Tibetological study, placing the field on a more scientific and professional footing. Yet this transformation was simultaneously shaped by colonial politics and the Christian missionary enterprise. Even as the Society secularized in the 1920s, missionary research continued to serve evangelistic ends. Taken together, the trajectory of NCBRAS Tibetology offers a microcosm of missionary knowledge production in modern China and illuminates the interplay among mission, empire, and scholarship.

ReligionsVol. 17(1)
Sichuan University (CN), Sichuan International Studies University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Evangelistic Imperative and the Modernity of Knowledge Production: Tibetology at the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1857–1952 — Peirong Li, Libin Xiong · Religions (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS