Usability of an mHealth-delivered physical activity intervention after mild stroke or transient ischemic attack: the role of therapist engagement and user barriers

Mobile Health (mHealth) is a promising tool for supporting long-term physical activity following stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), but its usability in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to: (1) compare the perceived usability of mHealth-delivered physical activity support among individuals post-stroke or TIA who received weekly physiotherapist support versus those who received infrequent support (5 sessions in total); and (2) identify factors associated with positive perceptions of mHealth usability. Adults with stroke or TIA were randomised to either a 6-month mHealth version of the i-REBOUND programme (frequent physiotherapist mHealth support) or a control group (infrequent physiotherapist mHealth support). Usability was assessed at 3 and 6 months using a modified Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. Group comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests, and multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with positive usability perceptions following intervention completion. Of the 114 participants, 51 (89%) in the i-REBOUND programme and 53 (93%) in the control group adhered to ≥ 40% of the intervention. At 3 months, more participants in the i-REBOUND group than in the control group reported easy access to the physiotherapist via chat (90% vs. 64%; P = .002) and a willingness to use mHealth again (90% vs. 66%; P = .003). At both follow-ups, a higher proportion of i-REBOUND participants reported improved access to physiotherapy (65–71% vs. 36–40%; P ≤ .004) and found mHealth acceptable (78–80% vs. 53–55%; P ≤ .002). Usability domains related to reliability—such as managing technical issues and clarity of error messages—were rated low in both groups. Visual difficulties using a smartphone (odds ratio = 0.34, P = .047) and high stress levels (score ≥ 15 on the DASS-21 stress scale; odds ratio = 0.19, P = .050) were independently associated with lower usability perceptions. mHealth-delivered support for physical activity was perceived as acceptable and accessible by people post-stroke or TIA, with higher usability reported in the group receiving regular physiotherapist support. Visual impairments and elevated stress levels were associated with lower perceptions of usability, which is an important finding for the future development of mHealth interventions post-stroke or TIA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05111951. Registered November 8, 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Digital Health
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-025-00232-x
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usability of an mHealth-delivered physical activity intervention after mild stroke or transient ischemic attack: the role of therapist engagement and user barriers

Lucian Bezuidenhout, Sverker Johansson, Hanna Lagerlund, David Moulaee Conradsson
BMC Digital Health
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Usability of an mHealth-delivered physical activity intervention after mild stroke or transient ischemic attack: the role of therapist engagement and user barriers

Lucian Bezuidenhout, Sverker Johansson, Hanna Lagerlund, David Moulaee Conradsson
article en

Abstract

Mobile Health (mHealth) is a promising tool for supporting long-term physical activity following stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), but its usability in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to: (1) compare the perceived usability of mHealth-delivered physical activity support among individuals post-stroke or TIA who received weekly physiotherapist support versus those who received infrequent support (5 sessions in total); and (2) identify factors associated with positive perceptions of mHealth usability. Adults with stroke or TIA were randomised to either a 6-month mHealth version of the i-REBOUND programme (frequent physiotherapist mHealth support) or a control group (infrequent physiotherapist mHealth support). Usability was assessed at 3 and 6 months using a modified Telehealth Usability Questionnaire. Group comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests, and multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with positive usability perceptions following intervention completion. Of the 114 participants, 51 (89%) in the i-REBOUND programme and 53 (93%) in the control group adhered to ≥ 40% of the intervention. At 3 months, more participants in the i-REBOUND group than in the control group reported easy access to the physiotherapist via chat (90% vs. 64%; P = .002) and a willingness to use mHealth again (90% vs. 66%; P = .003). At both follow-ups, a higher proportion of i-REBOUND participants reported improved access to physiotherapy (65–71% vs. 36–40%; P ≤ .004) and found mHealth acceptable (78–80% vs. 53–55%; P ≤ .002). Usability domains related to reliability—such as managing technical issues and clarity of error messages—were rated low in both groups. Visual difficulties using a smartphone (odds ratio = 0.34, P = .047) and high stress levels (score ≥ 15 on the DASS-21 stress scale; odds ratio = 0.19, P = .050) were independently associated with lower usability perceptions. mHealth-delivered support for physical activity was perceived as acceptable and accessible by people post-stroke or TIA, with higher usability reported in the group receiving regular physiotherapist support. Visual impairments and elevated stress levels were associated with lower perceptions of usability, which is an important finding for the future development of mHealth interventions post-stroke or TIA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05111951. Registered November 8, 2021.

BMC Digital HealthVol. 4(1)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, STROKE-Riksförbundet, Center for Innovative Medicine
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.