Simulation study of a low-cost Slide-Through PET scanner based on narrow flat panels with monolithic detectors

Background Patient throughput in conventional PET systems is constrained by limited system sensitivity and the need for bed positioning. This study proposes a cost-effective Slide-Through PET (ST-PET) design based on two narrow monolithic LYSO detector panels with depth-of-interaction (DOI) readout. Each vertical panel has a length of 190.5 cm and consist of a 20.9-cm-wide top part for scanning the torso, and a 10.3-cm-wide bottom part to image the legs. The panels translate laterally relative to a standing patient to cover a 73.9 cm-wide field of view. Methods The ST-PET system was simulated in GATE and compared with two reference designs: a cylindrical PET system, and a wide static flat-panel PET. All systems used identical high-resolution monolithic LYSO detectors (300 ps time-of-flight, 2.67 mm DOI). Different panel motion strategies were explored for the ST-PET, and system performance was assessed in terms of sensitivity, spatial resolution, and image quality using NEMA image quality and anthropomorphic XCAT phantoms. Results Parallel motion of the panels ensured complete anatomical coverage, whereas other motion strategies provided focused but incomplete sampling. Sensitivity for a whole-body water phantom was 1.66 cps/kBq in the upper region and 0.52 cps/kBq in the lower region, whereas the cylindrical reference system provided 1.05 cps/kBq in both regions. The ST-PET system achieved sub-3 mm spatial resolution in the center of the field of view. Image quality varied between the upper and lower ST-PET sections, with superior contrast recovery and noise characteristics in the torso region. Shorter scan times suffice using the ST-PET to obtain similar noise characteristics in the lung and liver than with the cylindrical reference. Mild elongation artifacts are observed in the IQ and XCAT images for both flat-panel systems. Conclusion ST-PET demonstrates the feasibility of a compact sliding-panel geometry that delivers high spatial resolution and competitive sensitivity while enabling workflow efficiencies that could enhance throughput in clinical PET. Additional improvements in TOF resolution are needed to mitigate limited angle artifacts, which would further enhance the relevance of such a narrow-panel geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physics
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2025.1712273
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation study of a low-cost Slide-Through PET scanner based on narrow flat panels with monolithic detectors

Jens Maebe, Boris Vervenne, Elke Dhaenens, S. Vandenberghe et al.
Frontiers in Physics
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Simulation study of a low-cost Slide-Through PET scanner based on narrow flat panels with monolithic detectors

Jens Maebe, Boris Vervenne, Elke Dhaenens, S. Vandenberghe, Christian Vanhove, Maya Abi Akl
article en

Abstract

Background Patient throughput in conventional PET systems is constrained by limited system sensitivity and the need for bed positioning. This study proposes a cost-effective Slide-Through PET (ST-PET) design based on two narrow monolithic LYSO detector panels with depth-of-interaction (DOI) readout. Each vertical panel has a length of 190.5 cm and consist of a 20.9-cm-wide top part for scanning the torso, and a 10.3-cm-wide bottom part to image the legs. The panels translate laterally relative to a standing patient to cover a 73.9 cm-wide field of view. Methods The ST-PET system was simulated in GATE and compared with two reference designs: a cylindrical PET system, and a wide static flat-panel PET. All systems used identical high-resolution monolithic LYSO detectors (300 ps time-of-flight, 2.67 mm DOI). Different panel motion strategies were explored for the ST-PET, and system performance was assessed in terms of sensitivity, spatial resolution, and image quality using NEMA image quality and anthropomorphic XCAT phantoms. Results Parallel motion of the panels ensured complete anatomical coverage, whereas other motion strategies provided focused but incomplete sampling. Sensitivity for a whole-body water phantom was 1.66 cps/kBq in the upper region and 0.52 cps/kBq in the lower region, whereas the cylindrical reference system provided 1.05 cps/kBq in both regions. The ST-PET system achieved sub-3 mm spatial resolution in the center of the field of view. Image quality varied between the upper and lower ST-PET sections, with superior contrast recovery and noise characteristics in the torso region. Shorter scan times suffice using the ST-PET to obtain similar noise characteristics in the lung and liver than with the cylindrical reference. Mild elongation artifacts are observed in the IQ and XCAT images for both flat-panel systems. Conclusion ST-PET demonstrates the feasibility of a compact sliding-panel geometry that delivers high spatial resolution and competitive sensitivity while enabling workflow efficiencies that could enhance throughput in clinical PET. Additional improvements in TOF resolution are needed to mitigate limited angle artifacts, which would further enhance the relevance of such a narrow-panel geometry.

Frontiers in PhysicsVol. 13
Ghent University (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.