Adaptation of the value orientation questionnaire by G. Allport for a Russian-speaking sample

For several decades, there has been a stable interest in the study of values and value orientations in domestic psychology. However, although most researchers have necessarily referred to the concept of value orientations by G. Allport in their works, the questionnaire he proposed seemed too complex for translation and adaptation, and subsequently, it has been cited less frequently in English-language literature due to the fact that many questions required adaptation to the changing cultural environment. This article presents the results of a comprehensive adaptation for a Russian-speaking sample of G. Allport's value orientation questionnaire "Study of Values" in the modern edition and modification by Kopelman and Rovenpor. The aim of the study was the cultural and linguistic adaptation of the methodology and the verification of its psychometric characteristics (reliability, convergent validity, and discriminative abilities). The study involved 43 respondents aged 18 to 68 years. During the adaptation, the style and content of the items were updated, discriminatory formulations were eliminated, and a new scale – "virtual value" – was introduced. An assessment of the new version of the questionnaire was conducted using mathematical statistics methods. The results of the study allow us to state that the proposed modification of the questionnaire is reliable, valid, and discriminative. The reliability of most scales (Cronbach's α) was confirmed after the item optimization procedure. Convergent validity was confirmed by significant correlations with Schwartz's "Portrait Values Questionnaire" (PVQ-RR) and A.N. Nikolaev's "Value Orientation Study Methodology" (VOSM). Discriminativeness was established by identifying significant differences in the value profiles of youth and middle-aged individuals. Special emphasis should be placed on the inclusion of a new value orientation, the virtual one, which reflects modern trends in societal development and has not yet been sufficiently reflected in contemporary research on values and value orientations, according to the authors. The adapted questionnaire demonstrates potential for application in scientific research and practical activities in the fields of psychology, education, HR, and intercultural communications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Психология и Психотехника
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0722.2025.4.76635
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptation of the value orientation questionnaire by G. Allport for a Russian-speaking sample

Lyudmila Valentinovna Trubitsyna, Denis Igorevich Knyazyatov
Психология и Психотехника
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Adaptation of the value orientation questionnaire by G. Allport for a Russian-speaking sample

Lyudmila Valentinovna Trubitsyna, Denis Igorevich Knyazyatov
article en

Abstract

For several decades, there has been a stable interest in the study of values and value orientations in domestic psychology. However, although most researchers have necessarily referred to the concept of value orientations by G. Allport in their works, the questionnaire he proposed seemed too complex for translation and adaptation, and subsequently, it has been cited less frequently in English-language literature due to the fact that many questions required adaptation to the changing cultural environment. This article presents the results of a comprehensive adaptation for a Russian-speaking sample of G. Allport's value orientation questionnaire "Study of Values" in the modern edition and modification by Kopelman and Rovenpor. The aim of the study was the cultural and linguistic adaptation of the methodology and the verification of its psychometric characteristics (reliability, convergent validity, and discriminative abilities). The study involved 43 respondents aged 18 to 68 years. During the adaptation, the style and content of the items were updated, discriminatory formulations were eliminated, and a new scale – "virtual value" – was introduced. An assessment of the new version of the questionnaire was conducted using mathematical statistics methods. The results of the study allow us to state that the proposed modification of the questionnaire is reliable, valid, and discriminative. The reliability of most scales (Cronbach's α) was confirmed after the item optimization procedure. Convergent validity was confirmed by significant correlations with Schwartz's "Portrait Values Questionnaire" (PVQ-RR) and A.N. Nikolaev's "Value Orientation Study Methodology" (VOSM). Discriminativeness was established by identifying significant differences in the value profiles of youth and middle-aged individuals. Special emphasis should be placed on the inclusion of a new value orientation, the virtual one, which reflects modern trends in societal development and has not yet been sufficiently reflected in contemporary research on values and value orientations, according to the authors. The adapted questionnaire demonstrates potential for application in scientific research and practical activities in the fields of psychology, education, HR, and intercultural communications.

Психология и Психотехника(4)
Rosinformagrotekh (RU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.