Complications of Port-a-Cath Systems: An Institutional Study on Romanian Oncological Patients

<b>Background</b>: Rising cancer incidence and mortality have increased the use of central venous catheters (CVCs), including peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and port-a-cath systems (PCSs), which play an important role in treatment administration. However, CVCs are associated with mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications. This study evaluates PCS-related complications and their management in oncological patients at The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță," Cluj-Napoca, Romania. <b>Methods</b>: This non-randomized, observational, retrospective study included cancer patients who had a PCS implanted at The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță," Cluj-Napoca, between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2024 and were enrolled in a follow-up protocol to monitor and manage PCS-related complications. This study evaluated the incidence of complications, their association with predefined prognostic factors, and their management. <b>Results</b>: In the study cohort (<i>n</i> = 124 patients), complications related to the PCS were observed in 20% of the patients, with a mean interval to complication onset of 47 days. Early-onset complications were observed in 40% of patients, while the remaining 60% developed late-onset complications. PCS infection was the most common complication (10 patients), followed by wound dehiscence and thrombosis (6 patients each). Bleeding, extravasation, catheter migration, port malfunction, and torsion were each documented in a single patient. No prognostic factors were significantly associated with early or late PCS complications, with thrombosis approaching significance (<i>p</i> = 0.051). <b>Conclusions</b>: PCSs are generally safe in oncology patients; infections and thrombosis predominate as PCS-related complications, but rarely require removal, and standardized care enables long-term use, improving patient quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18010174
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complications of Port-a-Cath Systems: An Institutional Study on Romanian Oncological Patients

Adina Nemeș, Diana Voskuil-Galoş, Tunde Banciu, Sebastian-Alexandru Pocol
Cancers
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Complications of Port-a-Cath Systems: An Institutional Study on Romanian Oncological Patients

Adina Nemeș, Diana Voskuil-Galoş, Tunde Banciu, Sebastian-Alexandru Pocol
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Rising cancer incidence and mortality have increased the use of central venous catheters (CVCs), including peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and port-a-cath systems (PCSs), which play an important role in treatment administration. However, CVCs are associated with mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications. This study evaluates PCS-related complications and their management in oncological patients at The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță," Cluj-Napoca, Romania. <b>Methods</b>: This non-randomized, observational, retrospective study included cancer patients who had a PCS implanted at The Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță," Cluj-Napoca, between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2024 and were enrolled in a follow-up protocol to monitor and manage PCS-related complications. This study evaluated the incidence of complications, their association with predefined prognostic factors, and their management. <b>Results</b>: In the study cohort (<i>n</i> = 124 patients), complications related to the PCS were observed in 20% of the patients, with a mean interval to complication onset of 47 days. Early-onset complications were observed in 40% of patients, while the remaining 60% developed late-onset complications. PCS infection was the most common complication (10 patients), followed by wound dehiscence and thrombosis (6 patients each). Bleeding, extravasation, catheter migration, port malfunction, and torsion were each documented in a single patient. No prognostic factors were significantly associated with early or late PCS complications, with thrombosis approaching significance (<i>p</i> = 0.051). <b>Conclusions</b>: PCSs are generally safe in oncology patients; infections and thrombosis predominate as PCS-related complications, but rarely require removal, and standardized care enables long-term use, improving patient quality of life.

CancersVol. 18(1)
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complications of Port-a-Cath Systems: An Institutional Study on Romanian Oncological Patients — Adina Nemeș, Diana Voskuil-Galoş, et al. · Cancers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS