Use of Artificial Intelligence in Burn Assessment: A Scoping Review with a Large Language Model-Generated Decision Tree

<b>Background:</b> Burns cause about 180,000 deaths annually and lead to substantial morbidity, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Clinical assessment of burn depth and TBSA relies on visual and bedside examination and remains subjective. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been proposed to improve objectivity in image-based burn assessment, but clinical generalizability and acceptance remain uncertain. <b>Aims:</b> To map current evidence on CNN performance for burn TBSA, burn depth and treatment-related tasks and to explore whether a large language model (LLM) can organize extracted findings into a transparent, literature-derived orientation decision tree. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched on 5 April 2025. Eligible studies reported CNN analysis of 2D burn images and quantitative performance metrics. We summarized reported values descriptively. We then provided a structured summary of extracted findings to ChatGPT to draft a one-page orientation decision tree. Two consultant burn surgeons reviewed the figure for clarity and plausibility. <b>Results:</b> Of 659 records, 24 studies were included. Across studies, reported performance for TBSA and depth assessment was often high, but study designs, datasets, labels, imaging modalities and validation strategies varied substantially. High reported performance does not necessarily imply clinical robustness or real-world accuracy. A single study reported high test-set accuracy for graft versus non-graft using heavily expanded data. This value should not be generalized. <b>Conclusions:</b> CNNs show promise for image-based burn TBSA and depth assessment, but heterogeneity, dataset limitations and limited external validation restrict interpretation and clinical transfer. The LLM-derived decision tree is a literature-synthesis orientation figure, not a clinical decision-support tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Burn Journal
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj7010004
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Burn Assessment: A Scoping Review with a Large Language Model-Generated Decision Tree

Sebastian Holm, Johann Zdolsek, Bahaman Nayyer, Fredrik Huss
European Burn Journal
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Burn Assessment: A Scoping Review with a Large Language Model-Generated Decision Tree

Sebastian Holm, Johann Zdolsek, Bahaman Nayyer, Fredrik Huss
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Burns cause about 180,000 deaths annually and lead to substantial morbidity, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Clinical assessment of burn depth and TBSA relies on visual and bedside examination and remains subjective. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been proposed to improve objectivity in image-based burn assessment, but clinical generalizability and acceptance remain uncertain. <b>Aims:</b> To map current evidence on CNN performance for burn TBSA, burn depth and treatment-related tasks and to explore whether a large language model (LLM) can organize extracted findings into a transparent, literature-derived orientation decision tree. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched on 5 April 2025. Eligible studies reported CNN analysis of 2D burn images and quantitative performance metrics. We summarized reported values descriptively. We then provided a structured summary of extracted findings to ChatGPT to draft a one-page orientation decision tree. Two consultant burn surgeons reviewed the figure for clarity and plausibility. <b>Results:</b> Of 659 records, 24 studies were included. Across studies, reported performance for TBSA and depth assessment was often high, but study designs, datasets, labels, imaging modalities and validation strategies varied substantially. High reported performance does not necessarily imply clinical robustness or real-world accuracy. A single study reported high test-set accuracy for graft versus non-graft using heavily expanded data. This value should not be generalized. <b>Conclusions:</b> CNNs show promise for image-based burn TBSA and depth assessment, but heterogeneity, dataset limitations and limited external validation restrict interpretation and clinical transfer. The LLM-derived decision tree is a literature-synthesis orientation figure, not a clinical decision-support tool.

European Burn JournalVol. 7(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Örebro University (SE), Örebro University Hospital (SE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.