Understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: Quorum Sensing, c-di-GMP Signaling, and Emerging Antibiofilm Approaches

<i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (<i>P. aeruginosa</i>) forms biofilms that are difficult to eliminate. The matrix protects the cells, efflux pumps reduce intracellular drug levels, and dormant subpopulations survive treatment. Routine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing does not account for these features, which helps explain why infections often continue even when therapy appears appropriate. This review describes how quorum-sensing (QS) and cyclic di-guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) regulate matrix production, efflux activity, and dormancy within <i>P. aeruginosa</i> biofilms. Important matrix components, including Psl, Pel, alginate, and extracellular DNA, slow the movement of antimicrobial agents. Regulatory proteins such as sagS and brlR increase the activity of the MexAB-OprM and MexEF-OprN efflux systems, further reducing intracellular drug concentrations. Oxygen and nutrient limitation promote persister cells and viable but nonculturable cells, with both having the ability to survive antibiotic levels that would normally be lethal. These defenses explain the gap between MIC values and biofilm-specific measurements, such as the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration and the minimum biofilm eradication concentration. This review also summarizes emerging antibiofilm strategies. These include QS inhibitors, compounds that lower c-di-GMP, such as nitric oxide donors, nanoparticles, depolymerases, bacteriophages, and therapies that are directed at host targets. Modern diagnostic tools, such as confocal laser scanning microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and Raman spectroscopy, improve detection and guide treatment planning. A staged therapeutic approach is presented that begins with the dispersal or loosening of the matrix, continues with targeted antibiotics, and concludes with support for immune clearance. Viewing these strategies within a One Health framework highlights the role of biofilms in clinical disease and in environmental reservoirs and supports more effective surveillance and prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010109
Primary Topic
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: Quorum Sensing, c-di-GMP Signaling, and Emerging Antibiofilm Approaches

Sulaiman Anagreyyah, Akram Abu-Okail, Mai Ibrahem, Eman Marzouk et al.
Microorganisms
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
article

Understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: Quorum Sensing, c-di-GMP Signaling, and Emerging Antibiofilm Approaches

Sulaiman Anagreyyah, Akram Abu-Okail, Mai Ibrahem, Eman Marzouk, Husam M. Edrees, Mahmoud Jaber, Sultan A AlGhamdi, Ahmed F Alzahrani, Ayman Elbehiry, Safiyah Alzahrani, Hussain Abualola
article en

Abstract

<i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (<i>P. aeruginosa</i>) forms biofilms that are difficult to eliminate. The matrix protects the cells, efflux pumps reduce intracellular drug levels, and dormant subpopulations survive treatment. Routine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing does not account for these features, which helps explain why infections often continue even when therapy appears appropriate. This review describes how quorum-sensing (QS) and cyclic di-guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) regulate matrix production, efflux activity, and dormancy within <i>P. aeruginosa</i> biofilms. Important matrix components, including Psl, Pel, alginate, and extracellular DNA, slow the movement of antimicrobial agents. Regulatory proteins such as sagS and brlR increase the activity of the MexAB-OprM and MexEF-OprN efflux systems, further reducing intracellular drug concentrations. Oxygen and nutrient limitation promote persister cells and viable but nonculturable cells, with both having the ability to survive antibiotic levels that would normally be lethal. These defenses explain the gap between MIC values and biofilm-specific measurements, such as the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration and the minimum biofilm eradication concentration. This review also summarizes emerging antibiofilm strategies. These include QS inhibitors, compounds that lower c-di-GMP, such as nitric oxide donors, nanoparticles, depolymerases, bacteriophages, and therapies that are directed at host targets. Modern diagnostic tools, such as confocal laser scanning microscopy, optical coherence tomography, and Raman spectroscopy, improve detection and guide treatment planning. A staged therapeutic approach is presented that begins with the dispersal or loosening of the matrix, continues with targeted antibiotics, and concludes with support for immune clearance. Viewing these strategies within a One Health framework highlights the role of biofilms in clinical disease and in environmental reservoirs and supports more effective surveillance and prevention.

MicroorganismsVol. 14(1)
Qassim University (SA), King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital (SA), King Fahd Military Medical Complex (SA), University of Tabuk (SA), King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.