Designing (Dis)Engagement: Reading the <i>Throwaway</i> Waste Exhibition as a Spatial Text

Grounded in discard studies and space-attentive discourse studies, this article reports a social semiotic analysis of the Throwaway exhibition at the Museum of European History in Brussels, Belgium (2023–2024). Paying particular attention to the exhibition’s compositional and interactive meanings, my analysis documents how waste and waste-making are narrated through a range of different visual-material-spatial resources; for example, diegetic and extra-diegetic framing, informational value and salience; stylistic and aesthetic choices; and tactile, auditory and interactive formats. As a form of public pedagogy, Throwaway encodes a contradictory way of (un)knowing waste whereby its core instructional objective of engagement is unhelpfully undermined by its disengaging design. Methodologically speaking, the article makes the case for reading exhibitions as multimodal, spatial texts rather than over-attending to their obvious representational content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space and Culture
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312251386625
Primary Topic
Literacy, Media, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing (Dis)Engagement: Reading the Throwaway Waste Exhibition as a Spatial Text

Crispin Thurlow
Space and Culture
Literacy, Media, and Education
article

Designing (Dis)Engagement: Reading the Throwaway Waste Exhibition as a Spatial Text

Crispin Thurlow
article en

Abstract

Grounded in discard studies and space-attentive discourse studies, this article reports a social semiotic analysis of the Throwaway exhibition at the Museum of European History in Brussels, Belgium (2023–2024). Paying particular attention to the exhibition’s compositional and interactive meanings, my analysis documents how waste and waste-making are narrated through a range of different visual-material-spatial resources; for example, diegetic and extra-diegetic framing, informational value and salience; stylistic and aesthetic choices; and tactile, auditory and interactive formats. As a form of public pedagogy, Throwaway encodes a contradictory way of (un)knowing waste whereby its core instructional objective of engagement is unhelpfully undermined by its disengaging design. Methodologically speaking, the article makes the case for reading exhibitions as multimodal, spatial texts rather than over-attending to their obvious representational content.

Space and Culture
University of Bern (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Literacy, Media, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Designing (Dis)Engagement: Reading the <i>Throwaway</i> Waste Exhibition as a Spatial Text — Crispin Thurlow · Space and Culture (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS