Similarities and Differences on the Electronic Structure and Chemical Bonding of Isoelectronic Molecules: X <sub>2</sub> NH and HNX <sub>2</sub> NH, where X = N and C <sup>–</sup>

Identifying similarities and differences among isoelectronic moieties is crucial for understanding chemical bonding, stability, and reactivity. Here, the molecular and electronic structures, chemical bonding, and binding energies of the N<sub>2</sub>NH, HNN<sub>2</sub>NH, [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>-/2-</sup>, and [HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>-/2-</sup> moieties are calculated via DFT, CCSD-(T), QCISD-(T), and MRCISD-(+Q) methodologies. Although N<sub>2</sub> and [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> are isoelectronic and both exhibit triple bonds in their ground <i>X</i> <sup>1</sup>Σ<sub>g</sub> <sup>+</sup> state and double bonds in their first excited <i>A</i> <sup>3</sup>Σ<sub>u</sub> <sup>+</sup> state, their binding energies and stabilities differ. These variations, along with the metastable nature of [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup>, affect the bonding and energetics of the studied species. Thus, the N<sub>3</sub>H and N<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub> molecules have singlet ground states, while the [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> and [C<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> anions present triplet ground states. The NN-NH is formed via a dative bond from N<sub>2</sub>(<i>X</i> <sup>1</sup>Σ<sub>g</sub> <sup>+</sup>) to NH-(<i>a</i> <sup>1</sup>Δ), while adding another NH, the bonding changes to HNN-NNH; their CCSD-(T) formation energies are -2.59 eV (N<sub>2</sub>NH) and -11.93 eV (HNN<sub>2</sub>NH). On the contrary, in both [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> and [HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> anions, electron charge is transferred to NH, i.e., the in situ diatomic moieties are excited states of [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>-</sup> and C<sub>2</sub> + NH<sup>-</sup> (X<sup>2</sup>Π). Their formation energies are -1.14 eV ([C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup>) and -8.57 eV ([HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup>). Electron transfer from metastable [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> to one or two NH stabilizes both [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> and [HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup>, suggesting their possible experimental detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c09124
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similarities and Differences on the Electronic Structure and Chemical Bonding of Isoelectronic Molecules: X 2 NH and HNX 2 NH, where X = N and C –

Demeter Tzeli, Georgios A. Tsekouras
ACS Omega
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

Similarities and Differences on the Electronic Structure and Chemical Bonding of Isoelectronic Molecules: X 2 NH and HNX 2 NH, where X = N and C –

Demeter Tzeli, Georgios A. Tsekouras
article en

Abstract

Identifying similarities and differences among isoelectronic moieties is crucial for understanding chemical bonding, stability, and reactivity. Here, the molecular and electronic structures, chemical bonding, and binding energies of the N<sub>2</sub>NH, HNN<sub>2</sub>NH, [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>-/2-</sup>, and [HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>-/2-</sup> moieties are calculated via DFT, CCSD-(T), QCISD-(T), and MRCISD-(+Q) methodologies. Although N<sub>2</sub> and [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> are isoelectronic and both exhibit triple bonds in their ground <i>X</i> <sup>1</sup>Σ<sub>g</sub> <sup>+</sup> state and double bonds in their first excited <i>A</i> <sup>3</sup>Σ<sub>u</sub> <sup>+</sup> state, their binding energies and stabilities differ. These variations, along with the metastable nature of [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup>, affect the bonding and energetics of the studied species. Thus, the N<sub>3</sub>H and N<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub> molecules have singlet ground states, while the [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> and [C<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> anions present triplet ground states. The NN-NH is formed via a dative bond from N<sub>2</sub>(<i>X</i> <sup>1</sup>Σ<sub>g</sub> <sup>+</sup>) to NH-(<i>a</i> <sup>1</sup>Δ), while adding another NH, the bonding changes to HNN-NNH; their CCSD-(T) formation energies are -2.59 eV (N<sub>2</sub>NH) and -11.93 eV (HNN<sub>2</sub>NH). On the contrary, in both [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> and [HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> anions, electron charge is transferred to NH, i.e., the in situ diatomic moieties are excited states of [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>-</sup> and C<sub>2</sub> + NH<sup>-</sup> (X<sup>2</sup>Π). Their formation energies are -1.14 eV ([C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup>) and -8.57 eV ([HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup>). Electron transfer from metastable [C<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup> to one or two NH stabilizes both [C<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup> and [HNC<sub>2</sub>NH]<sup>2-</sup>, suggesting their possible experimental detection.

ACS OmegaVol. 11(2)
University of Ioannina (GR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), National Hellenic Research Foundation (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.