Chinese Buddhist Canon Digitization: A Review and Prospects

The digitization of the Chinese Buddhist Canon represents a transformative shift in Buddhist textual scholarship, enabling unprecedented access to and analysis of one of East Asia’s most extensive scriptural collections. This review examines the evolution of digital platforms, with a focus on the Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association (CBETA) and the SAT Daizōkyō Text Database, which have become foundational resources in the field. It evaluates their respective methodological paradigms—CBETA’s critical edition model and SAT’s interoperable, ecosystem-based approach—while highlighting their shared reliance on the Taishō Tripiṭaka as a base text. The study identifies a persistent “Taishō bottleneck,” wherein the dominance of a single edition obscures the rich textual diversity inherent in the canon’s three major lineages: Central, Southern, and Northern. By surveying newly accessible image databases of key editions such as the Zhaocheng Jin Canon 趙城金藏, Sixi Canon 思溪藏, and Qidan Canon 契丹藏, the paper argues for a paradigm shift toward a multi-lineage collation framework. The integration of artificial intelligence—particularly in OCR, text–image alignment, and semantic analysis—is presented as essential for realizing a “Hybrid Digital Canon.” This model would harmonize genealogical, media, and methodological pluralism, fostering a more nuanced and historically grounded digital philology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010052
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese Buddhist Canon Digitization: A Review and Prospects

Xu Zhang
Religions
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Chinese Buddhist Canon Digitization: A Review and Prospects

Xu Zhang
article en

Abstract

The digitization of the Chinese Buddhist Canon represents a transformative shift in Buddhist textual scholarship, enabling unprecedented access to and analysis of one of East Asia’s most extensive scriptural collections. This review examines the evolution of digital platforms, with a focus on the Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association (CBETA) and the SAT Daizōkyō Text Database, which have become foundational resources in the field. It evaluates their respective methodological paradigms—CBETA’s critical edition model and SAT’s interoperable, ecosystem-based approach—while highlighting their shared reliance on the Taishō Tripiṭaka as a base text. The study identifies a persistent “Taishō bottleneck,” wherein the dominance of a single edition obscures the rich textual diversity inherent in the canon’s three major lineages: Central, Southern, and Northern. By surveying newly accessible image databases of key editions such as the Zhaocheng Jin Canon 趙城金藏, Sixi Canon 思溪藏, and Qidan Canon 契丹藏, the paper argues for a paradigm shift toward a multi-lineage collation framework. The integration of artificial intelligence—particularly in OCR, text–image alignment, and semantic analysis—is presented as essential for realizing a “Hybrid Digital Canon.” This model would harmonize genealogical, media, and methodological pluralism, fostering a more nuanced and historically grounded digital philology.

ReligionsVol. 17(1)
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chinese Buddhist Canon Digitization: A Review and Prospects — Xu Zhang · Religions (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS