Clinical and Laboratory Performance of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Pediatric Evidence

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative is a resin-ionomer hybrid marketed as a bioactive material for pediatric restorations, yet its specific performance in primary teeth has not been systematically synthesized. The study aim was to evaluate clinical and laboratory outcomes of ACTIVA in primary dentition compared with established restorative materials. <b>Methods:</b> Following a PRISMA-aligned, OSF-registered protocol, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to 18 October 2025 for full-text clinical trials and in vitro studies involving ACTIVA in primary teeth or primary dentin. Eligible designs included randomized or prospective clinical studies and standardized in vitro experiments. Primary outcomes were clinical and radiographic success; secondary outcomes included placement time, shear bond strength, and calcium-ion release. <b>Results:</b> Three randomized clinical trials (86 children, 305 restorations) and one in vitro study met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months, clinical success with ACTIVA ranged from 97.5 to 97.8% versus 95.0-97.8% for bulk-fill and conventional composites. At 24 months, a split-mouth trial reported clinical success of 93.0% for ACTIVA and 95.3% for compomer, with radiographic success of 86.0% and 88.3%, respectively, remaining within the predefined non-inferiority margin. ACTIVA required a mean of 2.4 ± 0.6 min less placement time than compomer. In vitro, shear bond strength to primary dentin was higher for ACTIVA than for an RMGIC (4.29 ± 0.65 vs. 2.47 ± 0.32 MPa), with greater calcium-ion release at 21 days (0.77 ± 0.13 vs. 0.53 ± 0.12 ppm). <b>Conclusions:</b> Within 1-2 years of follow-up, ACTIVA shows clinical performance in primary molars comparable to compomer, bulk-fill, and conventional composites, while offering shorter placement time and favorable bio-interactive behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010373
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
123.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Laboratory Performance of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Pediatric Evidence

Ştefania Dinu, Bogdan Andrei Bumbu, Magda Mihaela Luca, Romina Georgiana Bita et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dental materials and restorations
123.56
article

Clinical and Laboratory Performance of ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Pediatric Evidence

Ştefania Dinu, Bogdan Andrei Bumbu, Magda Mihaela Luca, Romina Georgiana Bita, Malina Popa, Edita Maghet
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative is a resin-ionomer hybrid marketed as a bioactive material for pediatric restorations, yet its specific performance in primary teeth has not been systematically synthesized. The study aim was to evaluate clinical and laboratory outcomes of ACTIVA in primary dentition compared with established restorative materials. <b>Methods:</b> Following a PRISMA-aligned, OSF-registered protocol, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to 18 October 2025 for full-text clinical trials and in vitro studies involving ACTIVA in primary teeth or primary dentin. Eligible designs included randomized or prospective clinical studies and standardized in vitro experiments. Primary outcomes were clinical and radiographic success; secondary outcomes included placement time, shear bond strength, and calcium-ion release. <b>Results:</b> Three randomized clinical trials (86 children, 305 restorations) and one in vitro study met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months, clinical success with ACTIVA ranged from 97.5 to 97.8% versus 95.0-97.8% for bulk-fill and conventional composites. At 24 months, a split-mouth trial reported clinical success of 93.0% for ACTIVA and 95.3% for compomer, with radiographic success of 86.0% and 88.3%, respectively, remaining within the predefined non-inferiority margin. ACTIVA required a mean of 2.4 ± 0.6 min less placement time than compomer. In vitro, shear bond strength to primary dentin was higher for ACTIVA than for an RMGIC (4.29 ± 0.65 vs. 2.47 ± 0.32 MPa), with greater calcium-ion release at 21 days (0.77 ± 0.13 vs. 0.53 ± 0.12 ppm). <b>Conclusions:</b> Within 1-2 years of follow-up, ACTIVA shows clinical performance in primary molars comparable to compomer, bulk-fill, and conventional composites, while offering shorter placement time and favorable bio-interactive behavior.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(1)
University of Oradea (RO), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Dental materials and restorations
123.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.