Why Some Want Something for Nothing: Three Explanations for Unfunded Spending Demand

ABSTRACT Several studies have documented ‘something for nothing’ (SFN) attitudes among citizens: preferences for increased government spending and lower taxes. Such a demand for unfunded public spending may generate unsustainable fiscal pressures. However, it is unclear what causes SFN attitudes at the individual level. While previous research emphasizes the role of political information, we explore how SFN attitudes also represent a rational response to economic vulnerability and service dissatisfaction. Using an original survey in Norway, we find that economic vulnerability is a pivotal explanation of SFN attitudes: lower income and education, being a benefit recipient, and perceived economic risks drive demand for welfare state support but dampen support for taxation. We also observe that political information and service satisfaction partially alleviate SFN attitudes by increasing taxation support more than spending demand. Understanding these drivers for unfunded public spending has implications for the sustainability of the welfare state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Political Studies
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.70034
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Some Want Something for Nothing: Three Explanations for Unfunded Spending Demand

Staffan Kumlin, Silke Goubin, David Weisstanner, Olivier Jacques
Scandinavian Political Studies
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Why Some Want Something for Nothing: Three Explanations for Unfunded Spending Demand

Staffan Kumlin, Silke Goubin, David Weisstanner, Olivier Jacques
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Several studies have documented ‘something for nothing’ (SFN) attitudes among citizens: preferences for increased government spending and lower taxes. Such a demand for unfunded public spending may generate unsustainable fiscal pressures. However, it is unclear what causes SFN attitudes at the individual level. While previous research emphasizes the role of political information, we explore how SFN attitudes also represent a rational response to economic vulnerability and service dissatisfaction. Using an original survey in Norway, we find that economic vulnerability is a pivotal explanation of SFN attitudes: lower income and education, being a benefit recipient, and perceived economic risks drive demand for welfare state support but dampen support for taxation. We also observe that political information and service satisfaction partially alleviate SFN attitudes by increasing taxation support more than spending demand. Understanding these drivers for unfunded public spending has implications for the sustainability of the welfare state.

Scandinavian Political StudiesVol. 49(1)
University of Lucerne (CH), University of Oslo (NO), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE), Université de Montréal (CA)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Norges Forskningsråd, Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.