Reframing treatment expectations: a lay theory perspective for understanding individuals’ beliefs about psychotherapy

<b>Abstract</b>Psychotherapy expectations are considered one of the common factors influencing therapeutic success. Two broad dimensions of psychotherapy expectations have been identified: expectations about treatment benefits (outcome expectations/OEs) and expectations about the therapy process (treatment expectations/TEs). Both dimensions have been previously investigated; however, the evidence of TEs has been restricted by methodological limitations and the lack of an overarching theory to guide in-depth investigations. This state of affairs likely contributes to an ongoing under-estimation of expectation effects in psychotherapy, which tend to lag behind current knowledge about placebo effects. The aim of this paper is to present the rationale for adopting a "lay theory of psychotherapy" approach as a conceptual model for TEs. Based on its theoretical assumptions, it is suggested that these lay theories of psychotherapy can be operationalized as individuals' change process expectations, or what individuals view as the expected mechanism producing therapeutic change. Core components of lay theories and their operationalization as change process expectations are discussed, including their associations with process, role, and duration expectations, their dynamics, their associations with OEs, and their predictive effect on therapy outcomes. A review of literature supporting this model is presented, as well as directions for future research assessing its validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2610377
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing treatment expectations: a lay theory perspective for understanding individuals’ beliefs about psychotherapy

Dana Tzur Bitan
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

Reframing treatment expectations: a lay theory perspective for understanding individuals’ beliefs about psychotherapy

Dana Tzur Bitan
article en

Abstract

<b>Abstract</b>Psychotherapy expectations are considered one of the common factors influencing therapeutic success. Two broad dimensions of psychotherapy expectations have been identified: expectations about treatment benefits (outcome expectations/OEs) and expectations about the therapy process (treatment expectations/TEs). Both dimensions have been previously investigated; however, the evidence of TEs has been restricted by methodological limitations and the lack of an overarching theory to guide in-depth investigations. This state of affairs likely contributes to an ongoing under-estimation of expectation effects in psychotherapy, which tend to lag behind current knowledge about placebo effects. The aim of this paper is to present the rationale for adopting a "lay theory of psychotherapy" approach as a conceptual model for TEs. Based on its theoretical assumptions, it is suggested that these lay theories of psychotherapy can be operationalized as individuals' change process expectations, or what individuals view as the expected mechanism producing therapeutic change. Core components of lay theories and their operationalization as change process expectations are discussed, including their associations with process, role, and duration expectations, their dynamics, their associations with OEs, and their predictive effect on therapy outcomes. A review of literature supporting this model is presented, as well as directions for future research assessing its validity.

Psychotherapy Research
Shalvata Mental Health Center (IL), University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.