Patterns of radiation-induced subependymal enhancement in patients with high-grade glioma

Background and purposeInterpretation of imaging findings after radiation can be challenging in patients with high-grade glioma. Appearance of contrast-enhancing lesions during follow-up imaging poses difficulty in differentiating true progression from treatment-related changes. In the current study, we report patterns and clinical outcomes of radiation-induced subependymal enhancement.Materials and methodsPatients with histopathological diagnosis of HGG developing radiation-induced contrast enhancement in the subependymal region were considered in the retrospective study. The subependymal enhancement was required to be in the high-dose region of radiotherapy. Patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which included T1-contrast, T2-weighted, perfusion, and spectroscopy. Confirmation of radiation changes rather than disease progression was decided based on regression or stability of concerned findings on follow-up imaging.ResultsThirty-four patients were included in the analysis. The median time from radiotherapy to onset of subependymal enhancement was 15 months. The enhancement pattern was feathery, nodular, and linear in 53%, 35%, and 3% of patients, respectively. A T2-hyperintense signal with a hypointense rim was seen in 74% of patients. Majority of these lesions were isoperfused (26%) or hypoperfused (47%). The median radiological follow-up after onset of subependymal enhancement was 7 months (range 1-61 months). At final follow-up, complete resolution, partial regression, and stable findings of the concerned enhancement were seen in 18%, 38%, and 44%, respectively.ConclusionSubependymal enhancement can be seen following radiation, which should be considered during the evaluation of follow-up imaging. Multiparametric MRI with specific contrast patterns, T2-weighted findings, and perfusion imaging can help identify radiation-induced enhancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Neuroradiology Journal
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251414342
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of radiation-induced subependymal enhancement in patients with high-grade glioma

Indraja D. Dev, Kajari Bhattacharya, Arpita Sahu, Debashish Sahay et al.
The Neuroradiology Journal
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Patterns of radiation-induced subependymal enhancement in patients with high-grade glioma

Indraja D. Dev, Kajari Bhattacharya, Arpita Sahu, Debashish Sahay, Dasgupta Archya, Daksh Mehta, P.C. Shetty, Abhishek Chatterjee, Tejpal Gupta, Ameya Puranik, Aliasgar Moiyadi, Nandini Menon, Epari Sridhar
article en

Abstract

Background and purposeInterpretation of imaging findings after radiation can be challenging in patients with high-grade glioma. Appearance of contrast-enhancing lesions during follow-up imaging poses difficulty in differentiating true progression from treatment-related changes. In the current study, we report patterns and clinical outcomes of radiation-induced subependymal enhancement.Materials and methodsPatients with histopathological diagnosis of HGG developing radiation-induced contrast enhancement in the subependymal region were considered in the retrospective study. The subependymal enhancement was required to be in the high-dose region of radiotherapy. Patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which included T1-contrast, T2-weighted, perfusion, and spectroscopy. Confirmation of radiation changes rather than disease progression was decided based on regression or stability of concerned findings on follow-up imaging.ResultsThirty-four patients were included in the analysis. The median time from radiotherapy to onset of subependymal enhancement was 15 months. The enhancement pattern was feathery, nodular, and linear in 53%, 35%, and 3% of patients, respectively. A T2-hyperintense signal with a hypointense rim was seen in 74% of patients. Majority of these lesions were isoperfused (26%) or hypoperfused (47%). The median radiological follow-up after onset of subependymal enhancement was 7 months (range 1-61 months). At final follow-up, complete resolution, partial regression, and stable findings of the concerned enhancement were seen in 18%, 38%, and 44%, respectively.ConclusionSubependymal enhancement can be seen following radiation, which should be considered during the evaluation of follow-up imaging. Multiparametric MRI with specific contrast patterns, T2-weighted findings, and perfusion imaging can help identify radiation-induced enhancement.

The Neuroradiology Journal
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.