Comparison of Repeat Power Ability During a High-Volume Squat Exercise in Resistance-Trained Males and Females

Background/Objectives: The effect of a high-volume, lower-body resistance exercise session on repeat power ability (RPA), defined as the ability to reach peak power (PP) or near PP during a high-volume resistance training session, remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of recovery time and sex on loss of power within and across sets during a high-volume, low-load squat session. Methods: Twenty-five resistance-trained males and females (age = 25.5 ± 7.2 years; ht = 169.8 ± 8.9 cm; wt = 75.9 ± 16.9 kg) completed the study. Mean power output across five sets was measured during two sessions (one-minute rest vs. two-minute rest) using a linear position transducer in random order. Five sets at 45% of the participant’s 1RM were completed until power output decreased below 80% of the participant’s within-set PP for two consecutive repetitions or until volitional exhaustion occurred. The data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA (recovery time by set by sex). Results: The males demonstrated a significant loss across sets for both the one-minute (194 watts) and two-minute recovery period (104 watts), while no change occurred for females in either condition. The males produced greater mean power across both recovery times and sets (p = 0.017). Further, a significant recovery time-by-set interaction was observed (p = 0.015). Mean power decreased an average of 111.3 watts during the one-minute recovery period compared to a loss of 54.0 watts during the two-minute recovery period. Lastly, within-set fatigue occurred during repetitions 9–11 and 11–14 during the one- and two-minute recovery periods, respectively. Conclusions: The data indicate that greater RPA occurs within and across sets with two minutes of rest. In addition, sex must also be considered when implementing a high-volume resistance training session with the goal of training repeat power ability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomechanics
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics6010005
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Repeat Power Ability During a High-Volume Squat Exercise in Resistance-Trained Males and Females

John W Farrell, Ting Liu, Joni A. Mettler, John Walker et al.
Biomechanics
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison of Repeat Power Ability During a High-Volume Squat Exercise in Resistance-Trained Males and Females

John W Farrell, Ting Liu, Joni A. Mettler, John Walker, Josh Harris, Kevin McCurdy
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The effect of a high-volume, lower-body resistance exercise session on repeat power ability (RPA), defined as the ability to reach peak power (PP) or near PP during a high-volume resistance training session, remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of recovery time and sex on loss of power within and across sets during a high-volume, low-load squat session. Methods: Twenty-five resistance-trained males and females (age = 25.5 ± 7.2 years; ht = 169.8 ± 8.9 cm; wt = 75.9 ± 16.9 kg) completed the study. Mean power output across five sets was measured during two sessions (one-minute rest vs. two-minute rest) using a linear position transducer in random order. Five sets at 45% of the participant’s 1RM were completed until power output decreased below 80% of the participant’s within-set PP for two consecutive repetitions or until volitional exhaustion occurred. The data were analyzed with a three-way ANOVA (recovery time by set by sex). Results: The males demonstrated a significant loss across sets for both the one-minute (194 watts) and two-minute recovery period (104 watts), while no change occurred for females in either condition. The males produced greater mean power across both recovery times and sets (p = 0.017). Further, a significant recovery time-by-set interaction was observed (p = 0.015). Mean power decreased an average of 111.3 watts during the one-minute recovery period compared to a loss of 54.0 watts during the two-minute recovery period. Lastly, within-set fatigue occurred during repetitions 9–11 and 11–14 during the one- and two-minute recovery periods, respectively. Conclusions: The data indicate that greater RPA occurs within and across sets with two minutes of rest. In addition, sex must also be considered when implementing a high-volume resistance training session with the goal of training repeat power ability.

BiomechanicsVol. 6(1)
Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US), Texas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.