Administration of Sodium Bicarbonate in Critically Ill Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background</b>: Metabolic acidosis is a frequent and serious complication in critically ill neonates, particularly preterm infants, and is associated with an increased risk of mortality, intraventricular hemorrhage, and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Despite limited evidence, sodium bicarbonate (SB) is widely administered in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to correct acidosis, largely extrapolated from adult and pediatric practice. However, concerns have been raised about its potential adverse effects, including paradoxical intracellular acidosis, impaired cerebral autoregulation, and increased risk of neurological injury. Given the uncertainty regarding both its efficacy and safety, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of SB administration in the neonatal population. <b>Methods</b>: MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched using specific medical subject headings and terms. We included all study published up to July 2025 that involved newborns treated with SB. The primary outcome was positive response to treatment, while secondary outcomes included mortality, morbidity, and long-term impairment. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed 10 studies (9 randomized and 1 unrandomized study, including 660 neonates). Pooled results from the randomized controlled studies showed no efficacy of SB in newborns. Data from one unrandomized study showed an increased risk for mortality (OR 13.1 <i>p</i> = 0.02), clinical seizures (OR 2.8, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and a combined outcome of death or neurological damage (OR 3.1 <i>p</i> < 0.01) for neonates treated with SB. <b>Conclusions</b>: Current evidence is insufficient to support the routine administration of SB in NICUs. Neonatologists have the responsibility to administer only drugs of proven efficacy, personalizing therapy on the basis of a pathology's etiology, in order to reduce risk and optimize benefits. In the absence of robust, statistically significant data, the indiscriminate use of SB should be discouraged in current clinical practice. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251132502.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16010026
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Administration of Sodium Bicarbonate in Critically Ill Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Susanna Esposito, Gianluca Terrin, Giovanni Boscarino
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Administration of Sodium Bicarbonate in Critically Ill Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Susanna Esposito, Gianluca Terrin, Giovanni Boscarino
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Metabolic acidosis is a frequent and serious complication in critically ill neonates, particularly preterm infants, and is associated with an increased risk of mortality, intraventricular hemorrhage, and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Despite limited evidence, sodium bicarbonate (SB) is widely administered in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to correct acidosis, largely extrapolated from adult and pediatric practice. However, concerns have been raised about its potential adverse effects, including paradoxical intracellular acidosis, impaired cerebral autoregulation, and increased risk of neurological injury. Given the uncertainty regarding both its efficacy and safety, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of SB administration in the neonatal population. <b>Methods</b>: MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched using specific medical subject headings and terms. We included all study published up to July 2025 that involved newborns treated with SB. The primary outcome was positive response to treatment, while secondary outcomes included mortality, morbidity, and long-term impairment. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed 10 studies (9 randomized and 1 unrandomized study, including 660 neonates). Pooled results from the randomized controlled studies showed no efficacy of SB in newborns. Data from one unrandomized study showed an increased risk for mortality (OR 13.1 <i>p</i> = 0.02), clinical seizures (OR 2.8, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and a combined outcome of death or neurological damage (OR 3.1 <i>p</i> < 0.01) for neonates treated with SB. <b>Conclusions</b>: Current evidence is insufficient to support the routine administration of SB in NICUs. Neonatologists have the responsibility to administer only drugs of proven efficacy, personalizing therapy on the basis of a pathology's etiology, in order to reduce risk and optimize benefits. In the absence of robust, statistically significant data, the indiscriminate use of SB should be discouraged in current clinical practice. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251132502.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(1)
University of Parma (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.