Manufacturer Incentive Provision for Consumer Deliberation in a Supply Chain With a Fair‐Minded Retailer

ABSTRACT This paper studies a manufacturer's incentive provision strategy for consumer deliberation in a decentralized supply chain with a fair‐minded retailer who is concerned with how the supply chain profit is allocated. Consumers who are initially uncertain about the quality of the product may incur fixed deliberation costs to ascertain their actual valuations of the product to make the proper purchase decisions. We develop a game‐theoretic model that accounts for the filtering effect exerted by a fair‐minded retailer on the upstream manufacturer's strategic pricing manipulation that intends to influence consumer deliberation, as well as the effect of their interactions on the dynamics of channel relationships. Some interesting results are obtained. First, our findings reveal that the manufacturer has a stronger incentive to lower the wholesale price driven by the retailer's fairness concerns when the deliberation cost is low or high. This incentive becomes especially salient if the retailer is highly averse to inequality such that, under specific conditions, channel coordination can always be achieved through a wholesale price policy in the presence of consumer deliberation. Second, the positive effect of the retailer's inequality aversion on the wholesale price can align her interest with the manufacturer's, such that her profit may be maximized even at a high deliberation cost. Third, when the retailer requires a low profit allocation ratio, the manufacturer may prefer a low wholesale price to motivate the retailer to inhibit consumer deliberation instead of a high wholesale price to provide an incentive for inducing it in the absence of retailer fairness concerns. Consequently, both channel members can benefit from retailer fairness concerns. Finally, the retailer becomes less inclined to fully empower the consumers if she is sufficiently inequity averse, whereas the manufacturer's empowerment decision remains unaffected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.70047
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manufacturer Incentive Provision for Consumer Deliberation in a Supply Chain With a Fair‐Minded Retailer

S N Huang, Li Bie
Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

Manufacturer Incentive Provision for Consumer Deliberation in a Supply Chain With a Fair‐Minded Retailer

S N Huang, Li Bie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper studies a manufacturer's incentive provision strategy for consumer deliberation in a decentralized supply chain with a fair‐minded retailer who is concerned with how the supply chain profit is allocated. Consumers who are initially uncertain about the quality of the product may incur fixed deliberation costs to ascertain their actual valuations of the product to make the proper purchase decisions. We develop a game‐theoretic model that accounts for the filtering effect exerted by a fair‐minded retailer on the upstream manufacturer's strategic pricing manipulation that intends to influence consumer deliberation, as well as the effect of their interactions on the dynamics of channel relationships. Some interesting results are obtained. First, our findings reveal that the manufacturer has a stronger incentive to lower the wholesale price driven by the retailer's fairness concerns when the deliberation cost is low or high. This incentive becomes especially salient if the retailer is highly averse to inequality such that, under specific conditions, channel coordination can always be achieved through a wholesale price policy in the presence of consumer deliberation. Second, the positive effect of the retailer's inequality aversion on the wholesale price can align her interest with the manufacturer's, such that her profit may be maximized even at a high deliberation cost. Third, when the retailer requires a low profit allocation ratio, the manufacturer may prefer a low wholesale price to motivate the retailer to inhibit consumer deliberation instead of a high wholesale price to provide an incentive for inducing it in the absence of retailer fairness concerns. Consequently, both channel members can benefit from retailer fairness concerns. Finally, the retailer becomes less inclined to fully empower the consumers if she is sufficiently inequity averse, whereas the manufacturer's empowerment decision remains unaffected.

Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
South China Agricultural University (CN), Minzu University of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.