Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery at Three or More Levels

Abstract Objective In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate the reoperation rates of patients after multilevel (≥ 3) contiguous lumbar decompressions without concomitant fusion. Methods We reviewed all spine surgeries performed over a 15-year period at a single Veterans Affairs hospital and identified patients who underwent multilevel lumbosacral (L4-S1) decompressions without fusion. Records were reviewed to confirm the surgery performed and determine if any subsequent spinal operations were performed. Patients with follow-up of less than 1 year were excluded. Results Forty-five patients (44 M:1 F), with a mean age of 68 years, met minimum 1-year of follow-up (median 27 months) and were included in the final analysis. Three patients (7%) underwent subsequent fusion at a previously decompressed level at 14, 23, and 25 months. Another three (7%) underwent revision decompression at previously decompressed levels at 6, 24, and 130 months. Five patients (11%) underwent reoperation in the first 2 months for wound complications related to infection or hematoma. One patient (2%) underwent debridement of an epidural abscess located three levels cranial to the most proximal decompression 6 years after index surgery; this was determined to be unrelated to the prior decompression. In total, 12 patients (27%) underwent reoperation at time of final follow-up. Conclusions The need for subsequent arthrodesis following decompressions of three or more consecutive levels without concomitant fusion may be less than intuitively suspected. Concomitant fusion at the time of index surgery is not necessarily warranted solely based on the number of levels decompressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01673-2
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery at Three or More Levels

Melissa Albersheim, Sharon C. Yson, Ryan J. Hoel, Jeffrey T. Luna et al.
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery at Three or More Levels

Melissa Albersheim, Sharon C. Yson, Ryan J. Hoel, Jeffrey T. Luna, Jonathan N. Sembrano, Paul Brian O. Soriano, Jason J. Haselhuhn, Kari Odland
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective In this retrospective study, we sought to investigate the reoperation rates of patients after multilevel (≥ 3) contiguous lumbar decompressions without concomitant fusion. Methods We reviewed all spine surgeries performed over a 15-year period at a single Veterans Affairs hospital and identified patients who underwent multilevel lumbosacral (L4-S1) decompressions without fusion. Records were reviewed to confirm the surgery performed and determine if any subsequent spinal operations were performed. Patients with follow-up of less than 1 year were excluded. Results Forty-five patients (44 M:1 F), with a mean age of 68 years, met minimum 1-year of follow-up (median 27 months) and were included in the final analysis. Three patients (7%) underwent subsequent fusion at a previously decompressed level at 14, 23, and 25 months. Another three (7%) underwent revision decompression at previously decompressed levels at 6, 24, and 130 months. Five patients (11%) underwent reoperation in the first 2 months for wound complications related to infection or hematoma. One patient (2%) underwent debridement of an epidural abscess located three levels cranial to the most proximal decompression 6 years after index surgery; this was determined to be unrelated to the prior decompression. In total, 12 patients (27%) underwent reoperation at time of final follow-up. Conclusions The need for subsequent arthrodesis following decompressions of three or more consecutive levels without concomitant fusion may be less than intuitively suspected. Concomitant fusion at the time of index surgery is not necessarily warranted solely based on the number of levels decompressed.

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
University of Minnesota (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.