Halogen Bonds under Electric Field with Quantum Accuracy and Relativistic Basis Sets

Halogen bonds (XBs) are a cornerstone of supramolecular chemistry, yet their response to external perturbations remains poorly investigated, particularly in systems with heavy elements where relativistic effects are significant. We benchmark two prototypical iodine-chloride X-bonded complexes, ClI···N(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> and ClI···NCH, under electric fields (EFs) using quantum chemical calculations up to CCSD and CCSD(T). Relativistic basis sets, including the all-electron jorge-TZP-DKH, are assessed against non-relativistic and pseudopotential-based alternatives (def2-TZVP, SDD, LANL2DZ) for their impact on XB geometries, binding energies, vibrational Stark shifts, and electron density redistribution. Explicit relativistic treatments substantially reduce the exaggerated field response otherwise observed. Benchmarking M06-2X and B3LYP with various basis sets against correlated methods confirms the accuracy of M06-2X, while showing that the relativistic effects included in the basis set influence the results more than the choice of functional itself. Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT) indicates that electrostatics dominate XB stabilization, with induction becoming more relevant under strong positive fields. Overall, XBs prove markedly more sensitive to external EFs than H-bonds across different field arrangements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c08038
Primary Topic
Crystallography and molecular interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Halogen Bonds under Electric Field with Quantum Accuracy and Relativistic Basis Sets

Franz Saija, Luigi Monsù Scolaro, Jing Xie, Sebastiano Trusso et al.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Crystallography and molecular interactions
article

Halogen Bonds under Electric Field with Quantum Accuracy and Relativistic Basis Sets

Franz Saija, Luigi Monsù Scolaro, Jing Xie, Sebastiano Trusso, Giuseppe Cassone, Klaudia Mràzikovà, Matteo Tommasini, Petr Eminger, Gabriele Ottanà, Simona Mastronardo, Martin Ferus
article en

Abstract

Halogen bonds (XBs) are a cornerstone of supramolecular chemistry, yet their response to external perturbations remains poorly investigated, particularly in systems with heavy elements where relativistic effects are significant. We benchmark two prototypical iodine-chloride X-bonded complexes, ClI···N(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub> and ClI···NCH, under electric fields (EFs) using quantum chemical calculations up to CCSD and CCSD(T). Relativistic basis sets, including the all-electron jorge-TZP-DKH, are assessed against non-relativistic and pseudopotential-based alternatives (def2-TZVP, SDD, LANL2DZ) for their impact on XB geometries, binding energies, vibrational Stark shifts, and electron density redistribution. Explicit relativistic treatments substantially reduce the exaggerated field response otherwise observed. Benchmarking M06-2X and B3LYP with various basis sets against correlated methods confirms the accuracy of M06-2X, while showing that the relativistic effects included in the basis set influence the results more than the choice of functional itself. Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT) indicates that electrostatics dominate XB stabilization, with induction becoming more relevant under strong positive fields. Overall, XBs prove markedly more sensitive to external EFs than H-bonds across different field arrangements.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry AVol. 130(2)
University of Messina (IT), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Charles University (CZ), Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry (UA), Czech Academy of Sciences, J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry (CZ), Institute for Chemical and Physical Processes (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Crystallography and molecular interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.