Evaluation of Conjunctivitis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Analysis of Quality and Treatment Proposals

<i>Introduction:</i> Conjunctivitis is an inflammation of the conjunctiva, commonly caused by bacteria, viruses, or allergens. It represents a significant portion of healthcare visits worldwide and is often self-limiting. However, it can cause considerable discomfort and lead to economic burdens, including medical expenses and lost productivity. Therefore, it is essential to develop and implement clear clinical practice guidelines to ensure appropriate management and avoid unnecessary interventions. Objective: This study aimed to identify and evaluate clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute primary conjunctivitis, focusing on their quality and practical applicability. <i>Methods: </i>A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases to identify relevant clinical practice guidelines. The quality of each guideline was assessed using an established evaluation method that examines six key domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence. <i>Results:</i> The search identified ten clinical practice guidelines, of which four were considered suitable for recommendation. The guidelines received the lowest scores in applicability and rigor of development, while clarity of presentation and editorial independence received the highest ratings. All guidelines emphasized non-pharmacological therapy as the preferred first-line treatment. <i>Conclusion</i>: Although four guidelines were recommended, their overall quality fell short of expectations, particularly in applicability and long-term intervention follow-up. These findings underscore the need for improvements to enhance the practical implementation and effectiveness of treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20251106.12
Primary Topic
Ocular Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Conjunctivitis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Analysis of Quality and Treatment Proposals

Daniel Tenório Silva, SM Gomes, Rodrigo Lima, Rosângela Gomes et al.
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
Ocular Infections and Treatments
article

Evaluation of Conjunctivitis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Analysis of Quality and Treatment Proposals

Daniel Tenório Silva, SM Gomes, Rodrigo Lima, Rosângela Gomes, Tiago Reis, Rafael Santana, Sara Oliveira, Débora Barros
article en

Abstract

<i>Introduction:</i> Conjunctivitis is an inflammation of the conjunctiva, commonly caused by bacteria, viruses, or allergens. It represents a significant portion of healthcare visits worldwide and is often self-limiting. However, it can cause considerable discomfort and lead to economic burdens, including medical expenses and lost productivity. Therefore, it is essential to develop and implement clear clinical practice guidelines to ensure appropriate management and avoid unnecessary interventions. Objective: This study aimed to identify and evaluate clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute primary conjunctivitis, focusing on their quality and practical applicability. <i>Methods: </i>A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases to identify relevant clinical practice guidelines. The quality of each guideline was assessed using an established evaluation method that examines six key domains: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence. <i>Results:</i> The search identified ten clinical practice guidelines, of which four were considered suitable for recommendation. The guidelines received the lowest scores in applicability and rigor of development, while clarity of presentation and editorial independence received the highest ratings. All guidelines emphasized non-pharmacological therapy as the preferred first-line treatment. <i>Conclusion</i>: Although four guidelines were recommended, their overall quality fell short of expectations, particularly in applicability and long-term intervention follow-up. These findings underscore the need for improvements to enhance the practical implementation and effectiveness of treatment strategies.

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical SciencesVol. 11(6)
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade Federal de Alfenas (BR), Ministério da Saúde (BR), Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (BR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ocular Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.