Laterality and technical-tactical shot indicators in elite Water Polo

The aims of this study were to compare the effectiveness of left-handed vs. right-handed players in goal-related actions and positive technical-tactical outcomes during play and evaluate shot efficacy across field positions in elite Water Polo. A total of 5422 shots (2724 male - 2698 female) from the XXXIV Male European Water Polo Championships and XVIII Female European Water Polo Championships were analysed using a nomothetic, multidimensional observational design. Inter-observer reliability (kappa > 0.90) was confirmed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0, employing Mann-Whitney U or chi-square tests to compare categorical outcomes. Results revealed left-handed players demonstrated superior efficacy in zones 1 and 2 (45.5% vs. 22.2% in zone 1; 48.8% vs. 36.3% in zone 2, p < 0.05) and generated more positive actions (23.9% vs. 13.8%). Shots from zones 1 and 2 showed lower efficacy compared to central positions (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that coaches should strategically exploit the positional advantages of left-handed—particularly in lateral attacking zones—by designing offensive structures and training tasks. Moreover, understanding the reduced efficacy of peripheral shooting zones can help refine defensive planning and guide players toward higher-probability shooting positions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of human movement
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2025.55.3
Primary Topic
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laterality and technical-tactical shot indicators in elite Water Polo

Francisco M. Argudo-Iturriaga
European journal of human movement
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
article

Laterality and technical-tactical shot indicators in elite Water Polo

Francisco M. Argudo-Iturriaga
article en

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare the effectiveness of left-handed vs. right-handed players in goal-related actions and positive technical-tactical outcomes during play and evaluate shot efficacy across field positions in elite Water Polo. A total of 5422 shots (2724 male - 2698 female) from the XXXIV Male European Water Polo Championships and XVIII Female European Water Polo Championships were analysed using a nomothetic, multidimensional observational design. Inter-observer reliability (kappa > 0.90) was confirmed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0, employing Mann-Whitney U or chi-square tests to compare categorical outcomes. Results revealed left-handed players demonstrated superior efficacy in zones 1 and 2 (45.5% vs. 22.2% in zone 1; 48.8% vs. 36.3% in zone 2, p < 0.05) and generated more positive actions (23.9% vs. 13.8%). Shots from zones 1 and 2 showed lower efficacy compared to central positions (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that coaches should strategically exploit the positional advantages of left-handed—particularly in lateral attacking zones—by designing offensive structures and training tasks. Moreover, understanding the reduced efficacy of peripheral shooting zones can help refine defensive planning and guide players toward higher-probability shooting positions.

European journal of human movementVol. 55
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.