Situational subject teaching—towards understanding the details of teachers' subject-specific didactic competence

Abstract The aim is to contribute to a characterisation of teachers' situational subject teaching , i.e. how teachers take into account the contributions from students in situ and how they create communication grounded in students' understanding of the topic, and thus facilitate topical progression. Observations from three classroom settings in social studies, science and Swedish are analysed. The results show two main types of teacher follow-up moves , these are re-phrasing what the students say in different ways and bridging between different parts that complement one another, thus giving the student opportunities to expand their understanding of the phenomenon. The results illustrate how situational subject teaching is constructed in different classroom settings, and how these interactions might impact both teachers' teaching and students' opportunities for learning. We suggest that more knowledge about the nature of situational teaching in different school subjects is of importance for developing theory and practice applicable in teacher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning (RISTAL)
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ristal-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Situational subject teaching—towards understanding the details of teachers' subject-specific didactic competence

Jessica Rahm, Anne Solli, Annika Lilja, Miranda Rocksén et al.
Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning (RISTAL)
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Situational subject teaching—towards understanding the details of teachers' subject-specific didactic competence

Jessica Rahm, Anne Solli, Annika Lilja, Miranda Rocksén, Anna Maria Hipkiss, Maria Svensson, Christina Osbeck
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim is to contribute to a characterisation of teachers' situational subject teaching , i.e. how teachers take into account the contributions from students in situ and how they create communication grounded in students' understanding of the topic, and thus facilitate topical progression. Observations from three classroom settings in social studies, science and Swedish are analysed. The results show two main types of teacher follow-up moves , these are re-phrasing what the students say in different ways and bridging between different parts that complement one another, thus giving the student opportunities to expand their understanding of the phenomenon. The results illustrate how situational subject teaching is constructed in different classroom settings, and how these interactions might impact both teachers' teaching and students' opportunities for learning. We suggest that more knowledge about the nature of situational teaching in different school subjects is of importance for developing theory and practice applicable in teacher education.

Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning (RISTAL)Vol. 8(1)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.