The philosophical and pedagogical legacy of K.D. Ushinsky: relevance in the context of modern educational challenges

The subject of the study is the ideas of K.D. Ushinsky, particularly his concepts of nationality, citizenship, and national self-consciousness, considered as ontological foundations for social integration and political identity. The theme of the work is the philosophical and pedagogical legacy of Ushinsky in the context of contemporary challenges: the crisis of collective identities, the erosion of civil solidarity, and the dominance of technocratic paradigms in education. The aim of the article is to conduct a philosophical reconstruction of Ushinsky's teachings, revealing its potential as a resource for understanding and overcoming the relevant socio-political and educational crises of the 21st century. Special attention is given to the interpretation of education not as a pedagogical technique, but as a condition for forming ethically responsible and politically mature individuals, rooted in cultural-historical tradition, yet open to universal values. The methodological foundation of the work consists of historical-philosophical analysis, hermeneutic interpretation of Ushinsky's texts as philosophical statements, and a comparative approach that includes relating his ideas to the concepts of C. Taylor, A. MacIntyre, M. Heidegger, I. Kant, and other thinkers. As a result of the research, it is shown that "nationality" in Ushinsky's view serves as a fundamental structure of social ontology. Ushinsky's pedagogy is interpreted as a form of socio-political engineering aimed at constructing a stable civic community through the synthesis of scientific rationality and cultural rootedness. The results of the study can be applied in the theory and practice of political education, the development of concepts of citizenship and national identity, as well as in the critical analysis of contemporary technocratic education models. The scientific novelty of the work lies in interpreting Ushinsky's pedagogical legacy as an original form of socio-political thought, in which education acquires the status of an ontological and ethical-political condition for the stability of society. The conclusions of the article confirm that Ushinsky's philosophy offers an alternative to both abstract cosmopolitanism and ethnocentrism, forming an ideal of citizenship rooted in cultural soil, yet open to universal values. His teachings maintain heuristic significance for the 21st century as a resource for constructing a morally grounded and politically mature society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Философская мысль
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2025.12.76850
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The philosophical and pedagogical legacy of K.D. Ushinsky: relevance in the context of modern educational challenges

Aleksandra Vadimovna Lapteva
Философская мысль
Digital Education and Society
article

The philosophical and pedagogical legacy of K.D. Ushinsky: relevance in the context of modern educational challenges

Aleksandra Vadimovna Lapteva
article en

Abstract

The subject of the study is the ideas of K.D. Ushinsky, particularly his concepts of nationality, citizenship, and national self-consciousness, considered as ontological foundations for social integration and political identity. The theme of the work is the philosophical and pedagogical legacy of Ushinsky in the context of contemporary challenges: the crisis of collective identities, the erosion of civil solidarity, and the dominance of technocratic paradigms in education. The aim of the article is to conduct a philosophical reconstruction of Ushinsky's teachings, revealing its potential as a resource for understanding and overcoming the relevant socio-political and educational crises of the 21st century. Special attention is given to the interpretation of education not as a pedagogical technique, but as a condition for forming ethically responsible and politically mature individuals, rooted in cultural-historical tradition, yet open to universal values. The methodological foundation of the work consists of historical-philosophical analysis, hermeneutic interpretation of Ushinsky's texts as philosophical statements, and a comparative approach that includes relating his ideas to the concepts of C. Taylor, A. MacIntyre, M. Heidegger, I. Kant, and other thinkers. As a result of the research, it is shown that "nationality" in Ushinsky's view serves as a fundamental structure of social ontology. Ushinsky's pedagogy is interpreted as a form of socio-political engineering aimed at constructing a stable civic community through the synthesis of scientific rationality and cultural rootedness. The results of the study can be applied in the theory and practice of political education, the development of concepts of citizenship and national identity, as well as in the critical analysis of contemporary technocratic education models. The scientific novelty of the work lies in interpreting Ushinsky's pedagogical legacy as an original form of socio-political thought, in which education acquires the status of an ontological and ethical-political condition for the stability of society. The conclusions of the article confirm that Ushinsky's philosophy offers an alternative to both abstract cosmopolitanism and ethnocentrism, forming an ideal of citizenship rooted in cultural soil, yet open to universal values. His teachings maintain heuristic significance for the 21st century as a resource for constructing a morally grounded and politically mature society.

Философская мысль(12)
Crimean State Engineering Pedagogical University (UA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.