AI with Symbolic Empathy: Shannon-Neumann Insight Guided Logic

We present an Artificial Intelligence with Symbolic Empathy, where an agent $$\mathcal {A}$$ cooperatively aligns a person’s cognitive state $$\vec {X}_P(t)$$ with their ideal trajectory $$\vec {X}_{L_P}(t)$$ . Alignment is guided by a context-sensitive, non-monotonic logic $$\mathcal {L}_{\mathcal {A}}$$ implemented as a five-stage Hierarchical FSM: $$\textsf{Identify}$$ (fact structuring), $$\textsf{Classify}$$ (pattern extraction), $$\textsf{Explore}$$ (intervention generation), $$\textsf{Plan}$$ (ontology-based misalignment diagnosis), and $$\textsf{Reason}$$ (abductive hypothesis evaluation). Reasoning is driven by the Shannon-von Neumann insight gain $$I_{SN}(\gamma _i) = \big [ \mathcal {H}(B_P(t)) - \mathcal {H}(B_P^{(i)}(t+1)) \big ] \cdot U(\gamma _i),$$ combining entropy reduction with goal-relevant utility. This metric enables self-supervised abductive learning, refining $$\mathcal {A}$$ ’s theory-of-mind and guiding psychologically meaningful, uncertainty-reducing interventions. The architecture ensures interpretability (I-AI), explainability (X-AI), and trustworthiness (T-AI) via explicit fact-rule tracing. Cognitive-cooperative case studies show that integrating symbolic causal models with utility-guided abductive-deductive reasoning yields transparent, goal-aligned human-AI interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Computation
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-025-10536-9
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI with Symbolic Empathy: Shannon-Neumann Insight Guided Logic

Edouard Siregar
Cognitive Computation
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

AI with Symbolic Empathy: Shannon-Neumann Insight Guided Logic

Edouard Siregar
article en

Abstract

We present an Artificial Intelligence with Symbolic Empathy, where an agent $$\mathcal {A}$$ cooperatively aligns a person’s cognitive state $$\vec {X}_P(t)$$ with their ideal trajectory $$\vec {X}_{L_P}(t)$$ . Alignment is guided by a context-sensitive, non-monotonic logic $$\mathcal {L}_{\mathcal {A}}$$ implemented as a five-stage Hierarchical FSM: $$\textsf{Identify}$$ (fact structuring), $$\textsf{Classify}$$ (pattern extraction), $$\textsf{Explore}$$ (intervention generation), $$\textsf{Plan}$$ (ontology-based misalignment diagnosis), and $$\textsf{Reason}$$ (abductive hypothesis evaluation). Reasoning is driven by the Shannon-von Neumann insight gain $$I_{SN}(\gamma _i) = \big [ \mathcal {H}(B_P(t)) - \mathcal {H}(B_P^{(i)}(t+1)) \big ] \cdot U(\gamma _i),$$ combining entropy reduction with goal-relevant utility. This metric enables self-supervised abductive learning, refining $$\mathcal {A}$$ ’s theory-of-mind and guiding psychologically meaningful, uncertainty-reducing interventions. The architecture ensures interpretability (I-AI), explainability (X-AI), and trustworthiness (T-AI) via explicit fact-rule tracing. Cognitive-cooperative case studies show that integrating symbolic causal models with utility-guided abductive-deductive reasoning yields transparent, goal-aligned human-AI interaction.

Cognitive ComputationVol. 18(1)
IE University (ES), New York Academy of Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.