Synonyms of the word illness in the idiolect of F. M. Dostoevsky

The subject of this study is the synonyms of the noun "illness" in the idiolect of F. M. Dostoevsky, compared with general usage, determined based on dictionaries and data from the National Corpus of the Russian Language. Of the large number of synonyms that existed in the Russian language of his time, the writer uses only five synonyms for the word illness, namely: nezdorov’ye (‘ill-being’), nedug (‘ailment’), nemoshch’ (‘infirmity’), nemoch’ (infirmity) and khvorost’ (‘sickness’). The aim of the study is to describe the specificity of the writer's idiolect, manifested both in the choice of words and in the distribution of their usage across different types of texts (fiction and epistolary). The type of text is significant for the writer's preferences: he uses some synonyms only in fiction (nemoshch’ – ‘infirmity’), nemoch’ – infirmity), while others are used primarily or exclusively in personal letters, referring to himself or his loved ones (nezdorov’ye – ‘ill-being’, khvorost’ – ‘sickness’). The study used general scientific and special methods of philological analysis: descriptive, quantitative, comparative, biographical; within the framework of the functional-semantic approach, lexical-semantic analysis with elements of component and conceptual analysis was used. The novelty of this work stems from the fact that, despite the significance of the theme of illness in F. M. Dostoevsky's fiction and life, the vocabulary of the corresponding semantic field has not yet been the subject of a dedicated linguistic study. The article identifies the specific features of the writer's idiolect within the vocabulary group under consideration. For example, F. M. Dostoevsky does not use the words zabolevaniye (‘disease’) and nedomoganiye (‘indisposition’), likely due to their literary nature. He prefers the less common khvorost’ (‘sickness’) to the colloquial khvor (‘sickness’). The most common word in the writer's idiolect (after the dominant illness) is nezdorov’ye (‘ill-being’), which is present primarily in his personal letters. It is typically used euphemistically in syntaxemes with the prepositions po, za, ot in the meaning of a reason (due to ill-being) and is accompanied by vocabulary indicating the failure to perform an action. The colloquial noun khvorost’ (‘sickness’) is used in a similar function and is present exclusively in the writer's personal letters. The words nedug (‘ailment’), nemoshch’ (‘infirmity’) and nemoch’ (infirmity) on the other hand, are found primarily in fiction. The usage of the words nedug (‘ailment’) and nemoshch’ (‘infirmity’) in the writer's idiolect differs significantly from dictionary definitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Филология научные исследования
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2025.12.77299
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synonyms of the word illness in the idiolect of F. M. Dostoevsky

LARISA ALEXANDROVNA ZHDANOVA, Tianxue Wang
Филология научные исследования
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Synonyms of the word illness in the idiolect of F. M. Dostoevsky

LARISA ALEXANDROVNA ZHDANOVA, Tianxue Wang
article en

Abstract

The subject of this study is the synonyms of the noun "illness" in the idiolect of F. M. Dostoevsky, compared with general usage, determined based on dictionaries and data from the National Corpus of the Russian Language. Of the large number of synonyms that existed in the Russian language of his time, the writer uses only five synonyms for the word illness, namely: nezdorov’ye (‘ill-being’), nedug (‘ailment’), nemoshch’ (‘infirmity’), nemoch’ (infirmity) and khvorost’ (‘sickness’). The aim of the study is to describe the specificity of the writer's idiolect, manifested both in the choice of words and in the distribution of their usage across different types of texts (fiction and epistolary). The type of text is significant for the writer's preferences: he uses some synonyms only in fiction (nemoshch’ – ‘infirmity’), nemoch’ – infirmity), while others are used primarily or exclusively in personal letters, referring to himself or his loved ones (nezdorov’ye – ‘ill-being’, khvorost’ – ‘sickness’). The study used general scientific and special methods of philological analysis: descriptive, quantitative, comparative, biographical; within the framework of the functional-semantic approach, lexical-semantic analysis with elements of component and conceptual analysis was used. The novelty of this work stems from the fact that, despite the significance of the theme of illness in F. M. Dostoevsky's fiction and life, the vocabulary of the corresponding semantic field has not yet been the subject of a dedicated linguistic study. The article identifies the specific features of the writer's idiolect within the vocabulary group under consideration. For example, F. M. Dostoevsky does not use the words zabolevaniye (‘disease’) and nedomoganiye (‘indisposition’), likely due to their literary nature. He prefers the less common khvorost’ (‘sickness’) to the colloquial khvor (‘sickness’). The most common word in the writer's idiolect (after the dominant illness) is nezdorov’ye (‘ill-being’), which is present primarily in his personal letters. It is typically used euphemistically in syntaxemes with the prepositions po, za, ot in the meaning of a reason (due to ill-being) and is accompanied by vocabulary indicating the failure to perform an action. The colloquial noun khvorost’ (‘sickness’) is used in a similar function and is present exclusively in the writer's personal letters. The words nedug (‘ailment’), nemoshch’ (‘infirmity’) and nemoch’ (infirmity) on the other hand, are found primarily in fiction. The usage of the words nedug (‘ailment’) and nemoshch’ (‘infirmity’) in the writer's idiolect differs significantly from dictionary definitions.

Филология научные исследования(12)
Vitebsk State Medical University (BY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.