The synthesis of philosophical traditions in the interpretation of post-nonclassical science

The subject of the research is the synthesis of key ideas from continental and analytic philosophical traditions with the aim of forming a new epistemological position that is adequate for understanding the challenges of post-nonclassical science. The object of the research is post-nonclassical scientific rationality, characterized by the complexity, multidimensionality, and value-laden nature of its objects, as well as the active role of the researcher in the process of cognition. The author examines in detail such aspects of the topic as the critique of science for its detachment from the "lifeworld" (E. Husserl), the problem of artificial intelligence and embodied engagement (H. Dreyfus), the essence of technology as "Equipment" (M. Heidegger), systemic materialism and emergent properties of reality (M. Bunge), methodological pluralism and epistemological anarchism (P. Feyerabend), as well as the deconstruction of logocentric foundations of scientific knowledge (J. Derrida). Special attention is given to the integrative role of John Searle's philosophy, whose concepts of biological naturalism and intentionality serve as a bridge between analytic and continental traditions, allowing for the overcoming of the gap between objective description and human experience. The research employs a method of comparative philosophical analysis with elements of a synthetic approach, enabling the integration of various philosophical traditions into a unified epistemological matrix for understanding post-nonclassical science. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of an original epistemological position intended to work with the complexity, multidimensionality, and paradoxical nature of contemporary scientific objects. The author demonstrates that the integration of continental and analytic philosophical traditions allows for overcoming the narrowness of one-sided approaches and creating a comprehensive methodology for studying post-nonclassical science. The main conclusions suggest that the synthesis of philosophical traditions forms a qualitatively new epistemological position capable of adequately responding to the challenges of the modern stage of scientific knowledge development. In particular, the proposed approach allows for the effective study of consciousness (combining Searle's biological naturalism with Dreyfus's phenomenology), language (integrating speech act theory with deconstruction), and techno-scientific systems (uniting Bunge's systemic approach and Heidegger's critique of technology). Thus, the article makes a significant contribution to the development of the philosophical foundations of post-nonclassical scientific rationality, offering productive pathways to solving fundamental problems of modern scientific knowledge.